ArticleRSC advances2024
Precision phenylalanine sensing in blood with nanomaterial-enhanced electrodes.
Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterizing human endorphins with fast-scan cyclic voltammetry and carbon fiber microelectrodes.Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phenylketonuria (PKU) is a genetic disorder associated with the metabolic dysfunction of the phenylalanine hydroxylase enzyme, which catalyses the conversion of l-phenylalanine (Phe) to l-tyrosine. Elevated levels of phenylalanine disrupt the central nervous system by impairing the myelination process and leading to mental retardation. Currently, commonly used diagnostic methods for PKU include the Guthrie test, liquid chromatography, and tandem mass spectrometry, all of which necessitate sophisticated infrastructure and costly equipment. Conversely, electrochemical detection methods hold promise in clinical diagnosis due to their high accuracy, rapid response time, and user-friendly nature. The choice of electrodes in electrochemical methods significantly influences sensitivity and analytical performance. In this study, we evaluated the performance of various nanomaterial-modified electrodes and compared their responses to the redox reaction of phenylalanine, focusing on detection capabilities in blood samples. Specifically, we examined carbon nanotube-gold nanoparticle modified carbon electrode (C-CNT-GNP), graphene-gold nanoparticle modified carbon electrode (C-GPH-GNP), electrochemically reduced graphene oxide (ERGO) modified carbon electrode (C-ERGO), bare carbon electrode (C-BARE), ERGO modified gold electrode (Au-ERGO), and bare gold electrode (Au-BARE) using amperometric detection. The performance of these electrodes was compared in terms of their limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), and sensitivity. Among all electrodes, ERGO gold electrode showed the lowest LOD, LOQ, and highest sensitivity. This study highlights the potential of ERGO-modified gold electrodes for enhancing electrocatalytic activity, thus offering promising prospects for further diagnostic applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.