ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
A nomogram for predicting neonatal apnea: a retrospective analysis based on the MIMIC database.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A clinical decision support system for predicting drug-related adverse effects in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease: Development and retrospective evaluation.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Baseline bicarbonate level is associated with apnea of prematurity in preterm neonates with neonatal jaundice: insights from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Association of monocyte to lymphocyte ratio with length of stay in intensive care unit in neonatal apnea modified by treatment.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The objective of this study is to develop a model based on indicators in the routine examination of neonates to effectively predict neonatal apnea. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 8024 newborns from the MIMIC IV database, building logistic regression models and decision tree models. The performance of the model is examined by decision curves, calibration curves and ROC curves. Variables were screened by stepwise logistic regression analysis and LASSO regression. Results: A total of 7 indicators were ultimately included in the model: gestational age, birth weight, ethnicity, gender, monocytes, lymphocytes and acetaminophen. The mean AUC (the area under the ROC curve) of the 5-fold cross-validation of the logistic regression model in the training set and the AUC in the validation set are 0.879 and 0.865, respectively. The mean AUC (the area under the ROC curve) of the 5-fold cross-validation of the decision tree model in the training set and the AUC in the validation set are 0.861 and 0.850, respectively. The calibration and decision curves in the two cohorts also demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance of the model. However, the logistic regression model performs relatively well. Discussion: Our results proved that blood indicators were valuable and effective predictors of neonatal apnea, which could provide effective predictive information for medical staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.