Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300953›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2024

Neural dynamics underlying the illusion of control during reward processing.

Ya Zheng, Canming Yang, Huiping Jiang, Bo Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ya ZhengDepartment of Psychology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7469-5955
Canming YangDepartment of Psychology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China.
Huiping JiangFaculty of Psychology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Bo GaoCenter for Reward and Social Cognition, School of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31971027the Guangdong Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project GD24CXL06the Research Fund from Guangzhou University YJ2023039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The illusion of control refers to a behavioral bias in which people believe they have greater control over completely stochastic events than they actually do, leading to an inflated estimate of reward probability than objective probability warrants. In this study, we examined how reward system is modulated by the illusion of control through the lens of neural dynamics. Participants in a behavioral task exhibited a classical illusion of control, assigning a higher value to the gambling wheels they picked themselves than to those given randomly. An event-related potential study of the same task revealed that this behavioral bias is associated with reduced reward anticipation, as indexed by the stimulus-preceding negativity, diminished positive prediction error signals, as reflected by the reward positivity, and enhanced motivational salience, as revealed by the P300. Our findings offer a mechanistic understanding of the illusion of control in terms of reward dynamics.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyIllusionsRewardAdolescentAdultBrainEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleMotivationYoung AdultERPsillusion of controlneural dynamicsreward processing

Identifiers

PMID39300953
PMCPMC11466228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.