Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300771›Full record

ReviewMass spectrometry reviews

Mass Spectrometry Structural Proteomics Enabled by Limited Proteolysis and Cross-Linking.

Haiyan Lu, Zexin Zhu, Lauren Fields, Hua Zhang, Lingjun Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mass spectrometry reviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. State-of-the-Art and Future Directions in Structural Proteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haiyan LuSchool of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Zexin ZhuSchool of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1605-3908
Lauren FieldsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Hua ZhangSchool of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Lingjun LiSchool of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0056-3869

Funding

Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R21AG065728, R01AG052324, R01AG078794, and R01DK071801). H.L. and H.Z. would like to thank the funding support for Postdoctoral Career Development Award provided by the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. L.F. was supported in part by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number T32GM008505 (Chemistry-Biology Interface Training Program). L.L. would like to acknowledge NIH grants S10OD028473, and S10OD025084, as well as funding support from a Vilas Distinguished Achievement Professorship and Charles Melbourne Johnson Professorship with funding provided by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exploration of protein structure and function stands at the forefront of life science and represents an ever-expanding focus in the development of proteomics. As mass spectrometry (MS) offers readout of protein conformational changes at both the protein and peptide levels, MS-based structural proteomics is making significant strides in the realms of structural and molecular biology, complementing traditional structural biology techniques. This review focuses on two powerful MS-based techniques for peptide-level readout, namely limited proteolysis-mass spectrometry (LiP-MS) and cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS). First, we discuss the principles, features, and different workflows of these two methods. Subsequently, we delve into the bioinformatics strategies and software tools used for interpreting data associated with these protein conformation readouts and how the data can be integrated with other computational tools. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive summary of the noteworthy applications of LiP-MS and XL-MS in diverse areas including neurodegenerative diseases, interactome studies, membrane proteins, and artificial intelligence-based structural analysis. Finally, we discuss the factors that modulate protein conformational changes. We also highlight the remaining challenges in understanding the intricacies of protein conformational changes by LiP-MS and XL-MS technologies.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryProteinsProteomicsAnimalsComputational BiologyCross-Linking ReagentsHumansPeptidesProtein ConformationProteolysisSoftwareCross-Linking ReagentsPeptidesProteinscross‐linkinginteractomelimited proteolysismass spectrometryneurodegenerative diseasesstructural proteomics

Identifiers

PMID39300771
PMCPMC13242716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.