Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300761›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2025

Predicting survival after Impella implantation in patients with cardiogenic shock: The J-PVAD risk score.

Toru Kondo, Tomo Yoshizumi, Ryota Morimoto, Takahiro Imaizumi, Shingo Kazama, Hiroaki Hiraiwa, Takahiro Okumura, Toyoaki Murohara, Masato Mutsuga

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Toru KondoDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6853-7574
Tomo YoshizumiDepartment of Cardiac surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Ryota MorimotoDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Takahiro ImaizumiDepartment of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Shingo KazamaDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroaki HiraiwaDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Takahiro OkumuraDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Toyoaki MuroharaDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Masato MutsugaDepartment of Cardiac surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsImpella has become a new option for mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS); however, prognostic models for patients after Impella are lacking. We aimed to identify the factors that predict in-hospital mortality in patients with CS requiring Impella and develop a new risk prediction model. METHODS AND

resultsWe utilized the J-PVAD registry, which includes all cases where Impella was implanted in Japan. Two-thirds of the patients in the J-PVAD registry were randomly assigned to the derivation cohort (n = 1701), and the other third was assigned to the validation cohort (n = 850). A backward stepwise logistic regression model was developed to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality. In the derivation cohort, 956 patients were discharged alive, and 745 patients (43.8%) died during hospitalization. Among 29 candidate variables, 12 were independently associated with in-hospital mortality and were applied as components of the risk model, including age, sex, body mass index, fulminant myocarditis aetiology, cardiac arrest in hospital, baseline veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use, mean arterial pressure, lactate, lactate dehydrogenase, total bilirubin, creatinine, and albumin levels. The comparison of predicted and observed in-hospital mortality according to the 7th quantiles using the J-PVAD risk score showed good calibration. The area under the curve for the J-PVAD risk score was 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.73-0.78). In the validation cohort, the J-PVAD risk score showed good calibration and discrimination ability.

conclusionsThe J-PVAD risk score can be calculated using variables easily obtained in routine clinical practice. It helps the accurate stratification of mortality risk and facilitates clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesRegistriesShock, CardiogenicAgedFemaleHospital MortalityHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRandom AllocationRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurvival RateCardiogenic shockImpellaMechanical circulatory supportPercutaneous ventricular assist devicePredictionRisk score

Identifiers

PMID39300761
PMCPMC11798632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.