Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300734›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational science2024

Randomized, double-blind, phase 1a single-ascending dose and food effect studies assessing safety and pharmacokinetics of EC5026 in healthy volunteers.

William K Schmidt, Irene Cortés-Puch, Cindy B McReynolds, Glenn E Croston, Sung Hee Hwang, Jun Yang, Theresa L Pedersen, Karen M Wagner, Theresa T Pham, Thomas Hunt and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Lipid metabolism in homeostasis and disease.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

William K SchmidtEicOsis Human Health Inc., a Subsidiary of EicOsis LLC, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5841-4810
Irene Cortés-PuchEicOsis Human Health Inc., a Subsidiary of EicOsis LLC, Davis, California, USA.
Cindy B McReynoldsEicOsis Human Health Inc., a Subsidiary of EicOsis LLC, Davis, California, USA.
Glenn E CrostonEicOsis Human Health Inc., a Subsidiary of EicOsis LLC, Davis, California, USA.
Sung Hee HwangEicOsis Human Health Inc., a Subsidiary of EicOsis LLC, Davis, California, USA.
Jun YangEicOsis Human Health Inc., a Subsidiary of EicOsis LLC, Davis, California, USA.
Theresa L PedersenEicOsis Human Health Inc., a Subsidiary of EicOsis LLC, Davis, California, USA.
Karen M WagnerEicOsis Human Health Inc., a Subsidiary of EicOsis LLC, Davis, California, USA.
Theresa T PhamPPD Development, LP, Austin, Texas, USA.
Thomas HuntPPD Development, LP, Austin, Texas, USA.
Bruce D HammockEicOsis Human Health Inc., a Subsidiary of EicOsis LLC, Davis, California, USA.

Funding

Development of a Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase Inhibitor to Spare or Replace Opioid AnalgesicsUH3DA048767 · NIDA · EICOSIS, LLC · PI Irene Cortes-Puch, BRUCE D HAMMOCK · 2024 to 2026
$7.0M
sEH Inhibitors to Treat Neuropathic PainR44ES025598 · NIEHS · EICOSIS, LLC · PI BUCKPITT, ALAN R, HAMMOCK, BRUCE D · 2016 to 2017
$1.5M
NIDA NIH HHS UH3 DA048767NIEHS NIH HHS R44 ES025598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pain represents a significant unmet medical need, affecting one-fifth of the U.S. population. EC5026 is a small molecule inhibitor of the enzyme soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) which is being developed as a novel non-opioid, non-NSAID analgesic. EC5026 prolongs the action of epoxy fatty acids, endogenous analgesic lipid mediators that are rapidly metabolized by sEH. We evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of EC5026 in two phase I trials, a single-ascending dose (SAD) study and a fed-fasted study. The SAD study evaluated EC5026 doses ranging from 0.5 to 24 mg in healthy volunteers. EC5026 was well tolerated. No treatment-emergent adverse events were considered related to EC5026. No apparent treatment- or dose-related trends in laboratory results, vital signs, physical examinations, or electrocardiograms were observed. A linear, near-dose-proportional increase in exposure was observed with progressive doses in the SAD study; plasma exposure was below or near the lower limit of quantification after 0.5-2 mg doses. Mean half-lives ranged from 41.8 to 59.1 h. for doses of 8-24 mg, supporting a once-daily dosing regimen. In the fed-fasted study using 8 mg EC5026 tablets, higher peak concentrations (66%) and total exposures (53%) were observed under the fed condition. Plasma concentrations declined in a monoexponential manner with mean half-lives of 59.5 h. in the fed state and 66.9 h. in the fasted state. Future clinical trials using EC5026 for the treatment of pain are justified based on the favorable outcomes from both clinical trials along with preclinical evidence of analgesic activity.

Indexed as

Food-Drug InteractionsHealthy VolunteersAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodEpoxide HydrolasesFastingFemaleHalf-LifeHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultEpoxide Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID39300734
PMCPMC11413051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.