ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2025
Assessment of Structural and Process Readiness for Postpartum Haemorrhage Care in Uganda and Ghana: A Mixed Methods Study.
Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scaling up implementation of the E-MOTIVE bundle for early detection and management of postpartum haemorrhage emergencies: A scoping review.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2026Review
- Heat-Stable Carbetocin in the Management of Postpartum Haemorrhage in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Evidence, Cost-Effectiveness, Implementation Challenges and Adoption Strategies.International journal of women's health · 2025Review
- Severe postpartum haemorrhage at a large referral hospital in Uganda: A prospective observational pilot study.PloS one · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine structural and process readiness for postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) care at referral-level facilities in Ghana and Uganda to identify opportunities for strengthening.
designMixed-methods cross-sectional study.
settingThree districts in Ghana and two in Uganda. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Nine hospitals in Ghana and seven in Uganda; all hospitals had theoretical capacity for caesarean section and blood transfusion.
methodsWe deployed a modular quantitative health facility assessment to explore structural readiness (drugs, equipment, staff) complemented by in-depth interviews with maternity health service providers to understand process readiness (knowledge, attitudes, and practices as related to World Health Organization [WHO] guidance on PPH care).
main outcome measuresAvailability of essential structural components needed to support key PPH processes of care.
resultsIn both countries, there was generally good structural readiness for PPH care. However, key common gaps included inadequate staffing (especially specialist physicians), and unavailability of blood for transfusion. Interviews highlighted particularly good process readiness in the provision of uterotonics, recognising and responding to retained placenta, and repairing tears. However, there were clear gaps in the utilisation of tranexamic acid and uterine balloon tamponade.
conclusionsWe have identified good structural and process readiness across both Ghanaian and Ugandan health facilities to support PPH responses. However, some key missed opportunities-to align with current WHO guidance on providing bundles of interventions for PPH care-could be strengthened with minimal investment but promising impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.