Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300729›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2025

The association between state cannabis policies and cannabis use among adults and youth, United States, 2002-2019.

Seema Choksy Pessar, Rosanna Smart, Tim Naimi, Marlene Lira, Jason Blanchette, Anne Boustead, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seema Choksy PessarDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2942-3974
Rosanna SmartRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1568-2097
Tim NaimiCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9849-4413
Marlene LiraWorkit Labs, Workit Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jason BlanchetteDepartment of Health Policy, Law, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Anne BousteadSchool of Government and Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Rosalie Liccardo PaculaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6145-9865

Funding

Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Martha Jane Bailey · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR POPULATION TRAINING PROGRAMT32HD007545 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HIRAM BELTRAN-SANCHEZ, Megan M Sweeney · 2001 to 2026
$4.1M
Impact of Marijuana Policies on Alcohol Use and Alcohol-Related MortalityR01AA026268 · NIAAA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI NAIMI, TIMOTHY SIMONDS · 2018 to 2021
$2.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA026268NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA026268NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041022NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo measure the association between state cannabis policies and use among adults and youth in the United States from 2002 to 2019, given rapid policy liberalization and complex state cannabis policy environments.

designRepeated cross-sectional time series analysis. Three sets of models assessed the linear association between the Cannabis Policy Scale (CPS), an aggregate measure of 17 state cannabis policy areas that weights each policy by its efficacy and implementation rating, and prevalence of cannabis use. The first included year and state fixed effects; the second added state-level controls; the third replaced state fixed effects with state random effects. Standard errors were clustered at the state level in all models. SETTING AND

participantsUnited States. MEASUREMENTS: Past-month prevalence of cannabis use is from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health Small Area Estimates, a nationally and state-representative cross-sectional survey of household population ages 12 and older for years 2002-2003 to 2018-2019. Exposure data include the CPS.

findingsA 10 percentage-point increase in the CPS (i.e. greater cannabis policy restrictiveness) was associated with lower past-month use prevalence by 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.05 to -0.56) to 0.97 (95% CI = -1.19 to -0.75) percentage-points for the population ages 12 years and older. When models were stratified by age, a 10 percentage-point increase in the CPS was associated with a 0.87 (95% CI = -1.13 to -0.61) to 1.04 percentage-point (95% CI = -1.03 to -0.84) reduction in past-month use prevalence for adults ages 18 years and older, and a 0.17 (95% CI = -0.24 to -0.09) to 0.21 percentage-point (95% CI = -0.35 to -0.07) reduction for youth ages 12-17 years.

conclusionsMore restrictive US cannabis policies appear to be associated with reduced cannabis use for both adults and youth.

Indexed as

Marijuana UseAdolescentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PolicyHumansMalePrevalencePublic PolicyState GovernmentUnited StatesYoung Adultcannabis legalizationcannabis policycannabis usemarijuana legalizationmarijuana policymarijuana use

Identifiers

PMID39300729
PMCPMC11638504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.