ArticleJournal of minimally invasive surgery2024
Rare anatomical variants encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in low resource conditions and the convenient concept of the safe zone of dissection: a prospective observational study at a single center.
Article in Journal of minimally invasive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intraoperative Variations of Cystic Artery and Duct in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.ANZ journal of surgeryPooled it
- Precision Preoperative Mapping of the Middle Hepatic Vein and Its Hidden Dangers: A Path to Safer Hepatobiliary Surgery.Current medical science · 2026Article
- Article
- Recognizing aberrant anatomy: a key concern in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The severity of surrounding adhesions, anomalous anatomy, and technical issues are the main factors that complicate cholecystectomy. This study focused on determining the types and frequency of laparoscopic anatomical variations found during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our limited-resources condition and on defining the safe zone of dissection. Methods: This prospective study was conducted at a single center in Aden, Yemen from 2012 to 2019. A total of 375 patients, comprising 355 females (94.7%) and 20 males (5.3%), presented with symptomatic gallbladders and underwent standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The regional laparoscopic variations were evaluated and recorded. Results: Of the 375 patients, 26 (6.9%) had laparoscopic anatomical variations, of whom 19 (73.1%) had vascular variations and seven (26.9%) had ductal variations. The anatomical variations included the following: double cystic artery of separated origin, seven cases (26.9%); Moynihan's hump, six (23.1%); double cystic artery of single origin, four (15.4%); thin long cystic duct, four (15.4%); subvesical duct, three (11.5%); and cystic artery hocking the cystic duct, two (7.7%). Conclusion: Biliary anatomical variations can be expected in any dissected zone. Most of the detected variants were associated with the cystic artery. An overlooked accessory cysto-biliary communication can cause complicated biliary leakage. A surgeon's skills and knowledge of laparoscopic anatomical variants are essential for performing a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.