Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300723›Full record

ArticleJournal of minimally invasive surgery2024

Analyzing the emergence of surgical robotics in Africa: a scoping review of pioneering procedures, platforms utilized, and outcome meta-analysis.

Adebayo Feranmi Falola, Oluwasina Samuel Dada, Ademola Adeyeye, Chioma Ogechukwu Ezebialu, Rhoda Tolulope Fadairo, Madeleine Oluomachi Okere, Abdourahmane Ndong

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of minimally invasive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adebayo Feranmi FalolaGeneral Surgery Community, Surgery Interest Group of Africa, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9509-4844
Oluwasina Samuel DadaGeneral Surgery Community, Surgery Interest Group of Africa, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1056-3742
Ademola AdeyeyeSignificant Polyp and Early Colorectal Cancer (SPECC) Service, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1739-5013
Chioma Ogechukwu EzebialuGeneral Surgery Community, Surgery Interest Group of Africa, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9792-0838
Rhoda Tolulope FadairoGeneral Surgery Community, Surgery Interest Group of Africa, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0514-7864
Madeleine Oluomachi OkereGeneral Surgery Community, Surgery Interest Group of Africa, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5120-7851
Abdourahmane NdongGeneral Surgery Community, Surgery Interest Group of Africa, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8103-1375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Surgical practice globally has undergone significant advancements with the advent of robotic systems. In Africa, a similar trend is emerging with the introduction of robots into various surgical specialties in certain countries. The need to review the robotic procedures performed, platforms utilized, and analyze outcomes such as conversion, morbidity, and mortality associated with robotic surgery in Africa, necessitated this study. This is the first study examining the status and outcomes of robotic surgery in Africa. Methods: A thorough scoping search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and African Journals Online. Of the 1,266 studies identified, 16 studies across 3 countries met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis conducted using R statistical software estimated the pooled prevalences with the 95% confidence interval (CI) of conversion, morbidity, and mortality. Results: Surgical robots are reportedly in use in South Africa, Egypt, and Tunisia. Across four specialties, 1,328 procedures were performed using da Vinci (Intuitive Surgical), Versius (CMR Surgical), and Senhance (Asensus Surgical) surgical robotic platforms. Urological procedures (90.1%) were the major procedures performed, with robotic prostatectomy (49.3%) being the most common procedure. The pooled rate of conversion and prevalence of morbidity from the meta-analysis was 0.21% (95% CI, 0%-0.54%) and 21.15% (95% CI, 7.45%-34.85%), respectively. There was no reported case of mortality. Conclusion: The outcomes highlight successful implementation and the potential for wider adoption. Based on our findings, we advocate for multidisciplinary and multinational collaboration, investment in surgical training programs, and policy initiatives aimed at addressing barriers to the widespread adoption of robotic surgery in Africa.

Indexed as

AfricaMinimally invasive surgical proceduresRobotic surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID39300723
PMCPMC11416894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.