Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300572›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2024

Automated classification of mixed populations of Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes under field conditions.

Fábio Castelo Branco Fontes Paes Njaime, Renato Cesar Máspero, André de Souza Leandro, Rafael Maciel-de-Freitas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. High-resolution characterisation of diel activity rhythms inCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Horizons of the Future: Preparedness and Response.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fábio Castelo Branco Fontes Paes NjaimePrograma de Pós-graduação em Vigilância e Controle de Vetores, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz - IOC, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Renato Cesar MásperoPrograma de Pós-graduação em Vigilância e Controle de Vetores, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz - IOC, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
André de Souza LeandroCentro de Controle de Zoonoses da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Brazil.
Rafael Maciel-de-FreitasCentro de Controle de Zoonoses da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Brazil. freitas@ioc.fiocruz.br.

Funding

Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa no Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/201.075/2022HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions 101086640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe recent rise in the transmission of mosquito-borne diseases such as dengue virus (DENV), Zika (ZIKV), chikungunya (CHIKV), Oropouche (OROV), and West Nile (WNV) is a major concern for public health managers worldwide. Emerging technologies for automated remote mosquito classification can be supplemented to improve surveillance systems and provide valuable information regarding mosquito vector catches in real time.

methodsWe coupled an optical sensor to the entrance of a standard mosquito suction trap (BG-Mosquitaire) to record 9151 insect flights in two Brazilian cities: Rio de Janeiro and Brasilia. The traps and sensors remained in the field for approximately 1 year. A total of 1383 mosquito flights were recorded from the target species: Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus. Mosquito classification was based on previous models developed and trained using European populations of Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens.

resultsThe VECTRACK sensor was able to discriminate the target mosquitoes (Aedes and Culex genera) from non-target insects with an accuracy of 99.8%. Considering only mosquito vectors, the classification between Aedes and Culex achieved an accuracy of 93.7%. The sex classification worked better for Cx. quinquefasciatus (accuracy: 95%; specificity: 95.3%) than for Ae. aegypti (accuracy: 92.1%; specificity: 88.4%).

conclusionsThe data reported herein show high accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and precision of an automated optical sensor in classifying target mosquito species, genus and sex. Similar results were obtained in two different Brazilian cities, suggesting high reliability of our findings. Surprisingly, the model developed for European populations of Ae. albopictus worked well for Brazilian Ae. aegypti populations, and the model developed and trained for Cx. pipiens was able to classify Brazilian Cx. quinquefasciatus populations. Our findings suggest this optical sensor can be integrated into mosquito surveillance methods and generate accurate automatic real-time monitoring of medically relevant mosquito species.

Indexed as

AedesCulexMosquito VectorsAnimalsBrazilFemaleMaleMosquito ControlAedes aegyptiCulex quinquefasciatusSmart trapSurveillanceWing beat

Identifiers

PMID39300572
PMCPMC11414234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.