ArticleBMC medical education2024
Evaluation of a collaborative multi-disciplinary train-the-trainer program for first responders in chemical, radiologic and nuclear emergencies - a pre- and post-test.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Training of the trainer for health professionals: sharing experience from Turkey to Tanzania.Medical education online · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn significant events like chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive (CBRNE) incidents, additional expertise in specific chemical substances becomes essential. Train-the-trainer programmes are used to increase knowledge and skills in a variety of fields and have been shown to be a cost-effective training method, eliminating the necessity of bringing in external experts or requiring participants to travel outside their region. Care in Hazardous Environments (CiHE) is one example of a course which comprises basic multi-disciplinary training together with personnel from rescue, police, and emergency medical services to prepare them to handle chemical and radioactive nuclear incidents. The train-the-trainer programme described in this study contains both theoretical and practical components, intended for instructors who will lead training on CiHE incidents. This study aimed to evaluate trainers' level of knowledge before and after a train-the-trainer programme, as well as their thoughts about becoming an instructor i.e. the pedagogical competence for the Care in Hazardous Environments course.
methodsA pre- and post-test, along with an evaluation of open-ended response options were employed to assess the effectiveness of the train-the-trainer programme for teaching the basic course (CiHE). A total of 49 participants were enrolled in the programme.
resultsParticipants showed significant improvement in chemical, radiological and nuclear (CRN) response knowledge in two of the eight questions between the pre- and post-tests. The two questions that improved pertained to chemical substances and basic principles of radiation protection. Instructors trained in the train-the-trainer programme are intended to bring new knowledge, incorporate a rarely discussed topic into instruction regularly, and de-stigmatise CRN incidents by helping raise the minimum competency levels in their respective organisation.
conclusionAn effective response to CBRNE events begins with readiness. First responders must be prepared and possess knowledge of both CRN components as well as protective gear to keep themselves and others safe at the incident scene. This study shows the importance of the train-the-trainer programme in continuing to educate police, and personnel from rescue and emergency medical services in CiHE, enable them to collaboratively prepare to handle CRN incidents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.