Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300462›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2024

Current status and influencing factors of nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards clinical research ethical in China: a province-wide cross-sectional survey.

Na Zhang, Qinqin Cheng, Wen Lu, Tingwei Luo, Zhiqiang Zhang, Sishan Jiang, Hongwen Qin, Lihui Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Na ZhangDepartment of Nursing, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Afliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, No. 283 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Qinqin ChengDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Afliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Wen LuDepartment of Interventional Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, The Afliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Tingwei LuoDepartment of Nursing, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Zhiqiang ZhangDepartment of Nursing, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Sishan JiangDepartment of Nursing, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Hongwen QinEthics Office, Hunan Children's Hospital, No.86, Ziyuan Road, Yuhua District, Changsha, Hunan, China. 798546207@qq.com.
Lihui ZhuDepartment of Nursing, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Afliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, No. 283 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, Hunan Province, China. 877845375@qq.com.

Funding

Research Project of the Hunan Provincial Nursing Association, China HNKY202203Scientific Research Program of Hunan Provincial Health Commission, China 20200634Scientific Research Program of Hunan Provincial Health Commission, China D202314058012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurses' competence in clinical research is a key element in promoting high quality in the discipline of nursing, and the ethical aspects of research are of paramount importance. Therefore, nurses need to have a comprehensive understanding of the ethics associated with clinical research, which is an integral part of safeguarding the safety of subjects, ensuring the quality of nursing clinical research, and improving the ethical standardization of clinical research.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted on 304 nurses in a province of China between April 2023 and September 2023, utilizing convenience sampling. The survey questionnaire comprised two sections: a general information form and a questionnaire focusing on nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards clinical research ethics. Data analysis encompassed descriptive statistics, t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and multiple linear regression.

resultsA total of 320 questionnaires were distributed, of which 304 were valid. The ethical attitude of nurses in clinical research was better (91.17 ± 15.96), while the cognitive score was lower (63.08 ± 12.30). The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that degree, grade of hospital (I, II or III), technical title, number of clinical projects chaired in one year and whether the respondent has ever participated in an ethics training were the five factors influencing the knowledge of clinical research ethics (F = 9.341, P < 0.001, R2 = 18.0%); degree, grade of hospital (I, II or III), technical title, number of clinical research projects chaired in one year, whether the hospital has an ethics committee and whether the respondent has ever participated in an ethics training were the six factors affecting ethical attitudes towards clinical research (F = 8.919, P < 0.001, R2 = 17.3%).

conclusionsNurses in a Chinese province scored low on the cognitive dimension of clinical research ethics, but their attitudes were at a relative high level, with many influencing factors. Degree, technical title, and grade of hospital, all affect cognitive and attitude scores. It is also worth noting that whether the hospital has an ethics committee affects the attitude scores, but has no effect on the cognitive scores.Nursing administrators and educators should consider providing effective and targeted strategies (e.g., ongoing training, scholarly seminars, and scholarly exchanges) to enhance nurses' knowledge and competence in clinical research ethics to protect subject rights as well as to ensure the quality of clinical research.

Indexed as

Clinical researchCross-sectional surveyEthical reviewEthicsNurses

Identifiers

PMID39300462
PMCPMC11414158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.