ArticleBMC surgery2024
Whether T-tube biliary drainage is necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hepaticojejunostomy and long-term interventional treatment for recurrent biliary stricture after proximal bile duct injury: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Advancements in postoperative pancreatic fistula: a comprehensive review of predictive factors, therapies, scoring systems and ongoing trials.eGastroenterology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are still a thorny problem. This study aims to verify the preventative impact of T-tube on them.
methodsThe electronic medical records and follow-up data of patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy in our center from July 2016 to June 2020 were reviewed. According to whether T tube was placed during the operation, the patients were divided into T-tube group and not-T-tube group. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to minimize selection bias.
resultsA total of 330 patients underwent PD (Not-T-tube group =226, T-tube group=104). Propensity score matching resulted in 222 patients for further analysis (Not-T-tube group =134, T-tube group=88). Patients' demographics were comparable in the matched cohorts. Significantly higher incidences of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) ((14 (10.45%) VS 20 (22.73%)), P=0.013) were observed in the T-tube group. The total incidence of biliary anastomotic stricture (BAS) was 3.15%. The incidence was slightly lower in the T-tube group, but there was no statistically significant differentiation (6 (4.48%) VS 1 (1.14%), P=0.317).
conclusionsIt is not feasible to prevent postoperative complications with the application of a T-tube in PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.