Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300446›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Effectiveness of implemented global dietary interventions: a scoping review of fiscal policies.

Wisdom Dogbe, Faical Akaichi, Vanessa Rungapamestry, Cesar Revoredo-Giha

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wisdom DogbeThe Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK. wisdom.dogbe@abdn.ac.uk.
Faical AkaichiScotland's Rural College (SRUC), Peter Wilson Building, King's Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK.
Vanessa RungapamestryThe Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
Cesar Revoredo-GihaScotland's Rural College (SRUC), Peter Wilson Building, King's Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK.

Funding

Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division 439203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the World Health Organisation (WHO) has proposed the use of fiscal policies to mitigate consumption externalities such as overweight and obesity-related diseases, very little is known about the impacts of the different types and framing of national and/or regional fiscal policies that have been implemented over the years. There is the need to provide up-to-date evidence on the impact of fiscal policies that have been enacted and implemented across the globe.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review of all implemented government fiscal policies in the food and drinks sector to identify the different types of fiscal policies that exist and the scope of their impact on consumers as well as the food environment. Electronic databases such as the Web of Science and Google Scholar were used to search for appropriate literature on the topic. A total of 4,191 articles were retrieved and 127 were synthesized and charted for emerging themes.

resultsThe results from this review were synthesized in MS Excel following Arksey & O'Malley (2005). Emerging themes were identified across different countries/settings for synthesis. The results confirms that fiscal policies improve consumers' health; increase the prices of foods that are high in fats, sugar, and salt; increase government revenue; and shift consumption and purchases towards healthier and untaxed foods.

conclusionGovernments already have the optimum tool required to effect changes in consumer behaviour and the food environment.

Indexed as

Global HealthDietHealth PromotionHumansNutrition PolicyEnergy-dense foodFiscal policiesSubsidySweetened beveragesTax

Identifiers

PMID39300446
PMCPMC11414226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.