ArticleRespiratory research2024
Metabolomic characterization of COVID-19 survivors in Jilin province.
Article in Respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has escalated into a severe global public health crisis, with persistent sequelae observed in some patients post-discharge. However, metabolomic characterization of the reconvalescent remains unclear.
methodsIn this study, serum and urine samples from COVID-19 survivors (n = 16) and healthy subjects (n = 16) underwent testing via the non-targeted metabolomics approach using UPLC-MS/MS. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were conducted to delineate the separation between the two sample groups and identify differentially expressed metabolites. By integrating random forest and cluster analysis, potential biomarkers were screened, and the differential metabolites were subsequently subjected to KEGG pathway enrichment analysis.
resultsSignificant differences were observed in the serum and urine metabolic profiles between the two groups. In serum samples, 1187 metabolites were detected, with 874 identified as significant (457 up-regulated, 417 down-regulated); in urine samples, 960 metabolites were detected, with 39 deemed significant (12 up-regulated, 27 down-regulated). Eight potential biomarkers were identified, with KEGG analysis revealing significant enrichment in several metabolic pathways, including arginine biosynthesis.
conclusionsThis study offers an overview of the metabolic profiles in serum and urine of COVID-19 survivors, providing a reference for post-discharge monitoring and the prognosis of COVID-19 patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.