ArticleBMC ophthalmology2024
Construction of living-cell tissue engineered amniotic membrane for ocular surface disease.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility Study of Decellularized Corneal Lenticule in a Porcine Model for Macular Hole Closure.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Rolled amniotic membrane for practical vascular graft development: a scoping review.Human cell · 2026Article
- Research on the construction of corneal endothelium transplantation with acellular amniotic membrane as a scaffold.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Amniotic membrane, a novel bioscaffold in cardiac diseases: from mechanism to applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHuman amniotic membrane (AM) transplantation has been applied to treat ocular surface diseases, including corneal trauma. The focus of much deliberation is to balance the mechanical strength of the amniotic membrane, its resistance to biodegradation, and its therapeutic efficacy. It is commonly observed that the crosslinked human decellularized amniotic membranes lose the functional human amniotic epithelial cells (hAECs), which play a key role in curing the injured tissues. METHODS AND
resultsIn this study, we crosslinked human decellularized amniotic membranes (dAM) with genipin and re-planted the hAECs onto the genipin crosslinked AM. The properties of the AM were evaluated based on optical clarity, biodegradation, cytotoxicity, and ultrastructure. The crosslinked AM maintained its transparency. The color of crosslinked AM deepened with increasing concentrations of genipin. And the extracts from low concentrations of genipin crosslinked AM had no toxic effect on human corneal epithelial cells (HCECs), while high concentrations of genipin exhibited cytotoxicity. The microscopic observation and H&E staining revealed that 2 mg/mL genipin-crosslinked dAM (2 mg/mL cl-dAM) was more favorable for the attachment, migration, and proliferation of hAECs. Moreover, the results of the CCK-8 assay and the transwell assay further indicated that the living hAECs' tissue-engineered amniotic membranes could facilitate the proliferation and migration of human corneal stromal cells (HCSCs) in vitro.
conclusionsIn conclusion, the cl-dAM with living hAECs demonstrates superior biostability and holds significant promise as a material for ocular surface tissue repair in clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.