Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300377›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2024

Trajectories of work disability among individuals with anxiety-, mood/affective-, or stress-related disorders in a primary healthcare setting.

Magnus Helgesson, Emma Pettersson, Elin Lindsäter, Heidi Taipale, Antti Tanskanen, Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz, Alexis E Cullen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Magnus HelgessonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE-17177, Sweden. magnus.helgesson@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-7868-9712
Emma PetterssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE-17177, Sweden.
Elin LindsäterDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE-17177, Sweden.
Heidi TaipaleDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE-17177, Sweden.
Antti TanskanenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE-17177, Sweden.
Ellenor Mittendorfer-RutzDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE-17177, Sweden.
Alexis E CullenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE-17177, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnxiety-, mood/affective-, or stress-related disorders affect up to one-third of individuals during their lives and often impact their ability to work. This study aimed to delineate trajectories of work disability (WD) among individuals diagnosed with anxiety-, mood/affective-, or stress-related disorder in primary healthcare and to examine associations between trajectory group membership and sociodemographic, clinical, and clinical-related factors.

methodsThe study population included working-age individuals, aged 22-62 years, living in Stockholm County, Sweden, who experienced a new episode of any anxiety-, mood/affective, or stress-related disorder in primary healthcare in 2017 (N = 11,304). Data were obtained from Swedish national and regional registers and were linked using pseudonymised unique personal identification numbers. The primary outcome was days with WD (sum of sickness absence and disability pension days) during the three years before and three years after a diagnosis of anxiety-, mood/affective-, or stress-related disorders in primary healthcare. A zero-inflated Poisson group-based trajectory model was used to identify groups of individuals with similar patterns of WD over the study period, with a multinomial logistic regression used to examine associations of sociodemographic, clinical, and clinical-related factors with trajectory group membership.

resultsFour distinct trajectory groups were found, high increasing (5.1%), with high levels, from 16 to 80 days of WD in six-monthly intervals during follow-up, peak (11.1%), with a peak in WD, up to 32 days of WD, around the time of the diagnosis, low increasing (12.8%), with an increase in days of WD from 4 to 22 during the study period, and constant low (71.1%), with almost no WD over the study period. In multinomial regression models, diagnostic category, psychotropic medication use, a diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder within secondary healthcare, age at diagnosis, and occupation were associated with WD trajectory groups.

conclusionsAround two-thirds of individuals treated for a new episode of any anxiety-, mood/affective-, or stress-related disorder in primary healthcare have an excellent prognosis regarding WD. Several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were associated with group membership; these factors could identify individuals at risk of long-term welfare dependency and who might benefit from interventions to promote a return to work.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersMood DisordersPrimary Health CareAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesRegistriesSick LeaveStress, PsychologicalSwedenYoung AdultAnxiety disorderDepressionPsychiatric disordersSick leaveStress disorder primary careWork capacity

Identifiers

PMID39300377
PMCPMC11414192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.