Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300354›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024

Population-based age- and type-specific prevalence of human papillomavirus among non-vaccinated women aged 30 years and above in Germany.

Linda A Liang, Luana F Tanaka, Kathrin Radde, Ulrike Bussas, Hans Ikenberg, Daniëlle A M Heideman, Chris J L M Meijer, Maria Blettner, Stefanie J Klug

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Linda A Liang *Chair of Epidemiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 56, 80992, Munich, Germany.
Luana F Tanaka *Chair of Epidemiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 56, 80992, Munich, Germany.
Kathrin RaddeChair of Epidemiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 56, 80992, Munich, Germany.
Ulrike BussasNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hans IkenbergMVZ Cytomol, Frankfurt, Germany.
Daniëlle A M HeidemanAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Chris J L M MeijerAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maria BlettnerInstitute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Stefanie J KlugChair of Epidemiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 56, 80992, Munich, Germany. sekretariat.klug.epidemiologie@mh.tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA persisting high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection is causal for cervical cancer; however, there is limited population-based data on the prevalence of HPV infections in Germany. We assessed the age and type-specific HPV prevalence, and associated risk factors in HPV unvaccinated women aged 30 and above.

methodsThe MARZY prospective population-based cohort study was conducted between 2005 and 2012 in Mainz and Mainz-Bingen, Germany. Eligible women were randomly recruited from population registries and invited for cervical cancer screening (n = 5,275). A study swab (liquid-based cytology) was taken and HPV testing was performed with GP5+/6 + polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by genotyping. We assessed HPV types as HR-HPV, 'moderate' risk and low-risk (LR-HPV). Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with HPV infection, stratified by HPV types.

results2,520 women were screened with a valid PCR result. Overall HPV prevalence was 10.6% (n = 266), with 6.5% HR-HPV positive (n = 165), 1.5% 'moderate' risk type (n = 38) and 3.3% LR-HPV type (n = 84) positive. 8.9% had a single infection (n = 225) and 1.6% had multiple types (n = 41). The most common HR-HPV types were 16, 56, 52 and 31 and LR-HPV 90 and 42. Of 187 HR-HPV infections detected (among 165 women), 55.1% (n = 103) were with HPV types not covered by available bivalent or quadrivalent HPV vaccines. About 23% (n = 43) were of types not covered by the nonavalent vaccine (HPV 35, 39, 51, 56, 59). The HR and LR-HPV prevalence were highest in the age group 30-34 years (HR 9.8%, 'moderate' risk 3.0% and LR 5.6%), decreasing with increasing age. HR-HPV prevalence in women with normal cytology was 5.5%. In women with a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), prevalence was 66.7%. Women currently not living with a partner and current smokers had increased chances of an HR-HPV infection.

conclusionThe overall population-based HPV prevalence was relatively high. An important share of prevalent HR-HPV infections constituted types not covered by current HPV vaccines. With the advent of HPV screening and younger vaccinated cohorts joining screening, HPV types should be monitored closely, also in older women who were not eligible for HPV vaccination.

Indexed as

PapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleGenotypeGermanyHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMiddle AgedPrevalenceProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical cancer screeningGermanyHuman papillomavirusPrevalenceRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID39300354
PMCPMC11414300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.