Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300334›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Three-dimensional numerical schemes for the segmentation of the psoas muscle in X-ray computed tomography images.

Giulio Paolucci, Isabella Cama, Cristina Campi, Michele Piana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giulio PaolucciMIDA, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Genova, via Dodecaneso 35, Genova, 16145, Italy.
Isabella Cama *MIDA, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Genova, via Dodecaneso 35, Genova, 16145, Italy.
Cristina Campi *MIDA, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Genova, via Dodecaneso 35, Genova, 16145, Italy.
Michele Piana *MIDA, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Genova, via Dodecaneso 35, Genova, 16145, Italy. piana@dima.unige.it.

Funding

Hub Life Science - Digital Health (LSH-DH) PNC-E3-2022-23683267 - Progetto DHEAL-COM D33C22001980001PROGRAMMA OPERATIVO REGIONE LIGURIA FONDO SOCIALE EUROPEO 2014-2020 RLOF18ASSRIC/58/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of the psoas muscle in morphological and functional imaging has proved to be an accurate approach to assess sarcopenia, i.e. a systemic loss of skeletal muscle mass and function that may be correlated to multifactorial etiological aspects. The inclusion of sarcopenia assessment into a radiological workflow would need the implementation of computational pipelines for image processing that guarantee segmentation reliability and a significant degree of automation. The present study utilizes three-dimensional numerical schemes for psoas segmentation in low-dose X-ray computed tomography images. Specifically, here we focused on the level set methodology and compared the performances of two standard approaches, a classical evolution model and a three-dimension geodesic model, with the performances of an original first-order modification of this latter one. The results of this analysis show that these gradient-based schemes guarantee reliability with respect to manual segmentation and that the first-order scheme requires a computational burden that is significantly smaller than the one needed by the second-order approach.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalPsoas MusclesSarcopeniaTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsImage segmentationSarcopeniaThree-dimensional level set methodsX-ray Computed Tomography (CT)

Identifiers

PMID39300334
PMCPMC11414197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.