Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300314›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2025

Genome-scale models in human metabologenomics.

Adil Mardinoglu, Bernhard Ø Palsson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dual-encoder contrastive learning accelerates enzyme discovery.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  8. SIMBA-GNN: mechanistic graph learning for microbiome prediction.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Unravelling the Complexity of Sarcopenia Through a Systems Biology Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Longitudinal big biological data in the AI era.Molecular systems biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adil MardinogluScience for Life Laboratory, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. adilm@scilifelab.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4254-6090
Bernhard Ø PalssonBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. palsson@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2357-6785

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabologenomics integrates metabolomics with other omics data types to comprehensively study the genetic and environmental factors that influence metabolism. These multi-omics data can be incorporated into genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs), which are highly curated knowledge bases that explicitly account for genes, transcripts, proteins and metabolites. By including all known biochemical reactions catalysed by enzymes and transporters encoded in the human genome, GEMs analyse and predict the behaviour of complex metabolic networks. Continued advancements to the scale and scope of GEMs - from cells and tissues to microbiomes and the whole body - have helped to design effective treatments and develop better diagnostic tools for metabolic diseases. Furthermore, increasing amounts of multi-omics data are incorporated into GEMs to better identify the underlying mechanisms, biomarkers and potential drug targets of metabolic diseases.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanMetabolomeMetabolomicsGenomicsHumansMetabolic DiseasesMetabolic Networks and Pathways

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.