SynthesisPediatric research2025
Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids supplementation and sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs) have proven to be essential for development in preterm infants and have been studied for their capacity to reduce inflammation and infection rates, including sepsis in enteral and parenteral nutrition. The aim of this review and meta-analysis is to gather the information available on this subject to determine if n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids can reduce sepsis incidence in preterm infants.
methodsThis systematic review was conducted by searching in the databases MEDLINE (via PubMed), ISI-Web of Science, EMBASE, SCOPUS, SciELO, and Cochrane Library databases. We analyzed the data regarding sepsis using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to assess the quality of the evidence.
resultsA total of 40 trials were included for review and 35 trials had the data available for quantitative analysis. LCPUFAs supplementation did not reduce incidence of sepsis (relative risk (RR), confidence interval (CI) 0.95 [0.87, 1.03] P = 0.87; I
conclusionThe results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that LCPUFA supplementation is not associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of sepsis in premature infants. IMPACT: Reviewing the information available about LCPUFA supplementation and sepsis since the results in previous Clinical Trials (CT) are inconclusive. It summarizes the results of 42 CT and we have not found conclusive results regarding sepsis in the literature. It could be of clinical interest for pediatricians and nutritionists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39300278What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.