Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300223›Full record

ArticleNature nanotechnology2024

A cuproptosis nanocapsule for cancer radiotherapy.

You Liao, Dongmei Wang, Chenglu Gu, Xue Wang, Shuang Zhu, Ziye Zheng, Fuquan Zhang, Junfang Yan, Zhanjun Gu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature nanotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Role of Ferredoxin 1Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Highly Active CuAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Radiotherapy meets anticancer metallodrugs.Medical review (2021) · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

You Liao *CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3765-4529
Dongmei Wang *CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5995-631X
Chenglu GuCAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xue WangCAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shuang ZhuCAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3962-0587
Ziye ZhengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Fuquan ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Junfang YanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. yanjunfang@pumch.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0101-5947
Zhanjun GuCAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. zjgu@ihep.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3717-2423

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 22375205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residual tumours that persist after radiotherapy often develop acquired radiation resistance, increasing the risk of recurrence and metastasis while providing obstacles to re-irradiation. Using samples from patients and experimental mice, we discovered that FDX1 and LIAS, key regulators of cuproptosis, were up-regulated in residual tumours following radiotherapy, conferring the increased sensitivity to cuproptosis. Therefore, we proposed a novel radiosensitization strategy focused on cuproptosis, using a copper-containing nanocapsule-like polyoxometalate as a paradigm. In an initial demonstration, we showed that the nanocapsule released copper ions in a controlled manner upon exposure to ionizing radiation. Furthermore, radiation-triggered cuproptosis overcame acquired radiation resistance even at clinically relevant radiation doses and activated a robust abscopal effect, with a 40% cure rate in both radioresistant and re-irradiation tumour models. Collectively, targeting cuproptosis is a compelling strategy for addressing acquired radiation resistance, optimizing the local antitumour effects of radiotherapy while simultaneously activating systemic antitumour immunity.

Indexed as

CopperNanocapsulesAnimalsCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansMiceNeoplasmsRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsRadiation ToleranceCopperNanocapsulesRadiation-Sensitizing Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.