Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300172›Full record

ArticleNature structural & molecular biology2025

Catalytic and noncatalytic functions of DNA polymerase κ in translesion DNA synthesis.

Selene Sellés-Baiget, Sara M Ambjørn, Alberto Carli, Ivo A Hendriks, Irene Gallina, Norman E Davey, Bente Benedict, Alessandra Zarantonello, Sampath A Gadi, Bob Meeusen and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A proteome-wide dependency map of protein interaction motifs.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Selene Sellés-BaigetNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sara M Ambjørn *Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5571-1382
Alberto Carli *Center for Chromosome Stability, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ivo A Hendriks *Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1439-3701
Irene GallinaNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Norman E DaveyDivision of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6988-4850
Bente BenedictNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alessandra ZarantonelloNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9769-2271
Sampath A GadiNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bob MeeusenNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Emil P T HertzNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6996-3559
Laura SlappendelDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Daniel SemlowDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6538-9713
Shana SturlaDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6808-5950
Michael L NielsenNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0067-9039
Jakob NilssonNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4100-1125
Thomas C R MillerCenter for Chromosome Stability, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9749-1656
Julien P DuxinNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Julien.duxin@bric.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9389-4186

Funding

Supplement: Emerging Mechanisms of Replication-coupled DNA RepairR01GM151410 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Daniel Semlow · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM151410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) is a cellular process that enables the bypass of DNA lesions encountered during DNA replication and is emerging as a primary target of chemotherapy. Among vertebrate DNA polymerases, polymerase κ (Polκ) has the distinctive ability to bypass minor groove DNA adducts in vitro. However, Polκ is also required for cells to overcome major groove DNA adducts but the basis of this requirement is unclear. Here, we combine CRISPR base-editor screening technology in human cells with TLS analysis of defined DNA lesions in Xenopus egg extracts to unravel the functions and regulations of Polκ during lesion bypass. Strikingly, we show that Polκ has two main functions during TLS, which are differentially regulated by Rev1 binding. On the one hand, Polκ is essential to replicate across a minor groove DNA lesion in a process that depends on PCNA ubiquitylation but is independent of Rev1. On the other hand, through its cooperative interaction with Rev1 and ubiquitylated PCNA, Polκ appears to stabilize the Rev1-Polζ extension complex on DNA to allow extension past major groove DNA lesions and abasic sites, in a process that is independent of Polκ's catalytic activity. Together, our work identifies catalytic and noncatalytic functions of Polκ in TLS and reveals important regulatory mechanisms underlying the unique domain architecture present at the C-terminal end of Y-family TLS polymerases.

Indexed as

DNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA RepairAnimalsDNA DamageDNA ReplicationHumansNucleotidyltransferasesProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenTranslesion DNA SynthesisUbiquitinationXenopus laevisY-Family DNA PolymerasesDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseNucleotidyltransferasesPOLK protein, humanProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenREV1 protein, humanY-Family DNA Polymerases

Identifiers

PMID39300172
PMCPMC11832425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.