Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300141›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Maintenance and transformation of representational formats during working memory prioritization.

Daniel Pacheco-Estefan, Marie-Christin Fellner, Lukas Kunz, Hui Zhang, Peter Reinacher, Charlotte Roy, Armin Brandt, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Linglin Yang, Shuang Wang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hippocampal-guided reconstruction of an event's prior temporal context.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Daniel Pacheco-Estefan *Department of Neuropsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801, Bochum, Germany. Daniel.PachecoEstefan@ruhr-uni-bochum.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2253-5172
Marie-Christin Fellner *Department of Neuropsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
Lukas KunzDepartment of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0665-7703
Hui ZhangDepartment of Neuropsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
Peter ReinacherDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Medical Center - Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1691-546X
Charlotte RoyEpilepsy Center, Medical Center - Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Armin BrandtEpilepsy Center, Medical Center - Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Andreas Schulze-BonhageEpilepsy Center, Medical Center - Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2382-0506
Linglin YangDepartment of Psychiatry, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Shuang WangDepartment of Neurology, Epilepsy center, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jing LiuDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Gui XueState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning and IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, PR China.ORCID 0000-0001-7891-8151
Nikolai AxmacherDepartment of Neuropsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801, Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0475-6492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual working memory depends on both material-specific brain areas in the ventral visual stream (VVS) that support the maintenance of stimulus representations and on regions in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) that control these representations. How executive control prioritizes working memory contents and whether this affects their representational formats remains an open question, however. Here, we analyzed intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings in epilepsy patients with electrodes in VVS and PFC who performed a multi-item working memory task involving a retro-cue. We employed Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) with various Deep Neural Network (DNN) architectures to investigate the representational format of prioritized VWM content. While recurrent DNN representations matched PFC representations in the beta band (15-29 Hz) following the retro-cue, they corresponded to VVS representations in a lower frequency range (3-14 Hz) towards the end of the maintenance period. Our findings highlight the distinct coding schemes and representational formats of prioritized content in VVS and PFC.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermPrefrontal CortexAdultBrain MappingCuesElectrocorticographyElectroencephalographyEpilepsyExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39300141
PMCPMC11412997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.