ArticleScientific reports2024
NMDA receptor antagonist high-frequency oscillations are transmitted via bottom-up feedforward processing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In mammals, NMDA receptor antagonists have been linked to the emergence of high-frequency oscillations (HFO, 130-180 Hz) in cortical and subcortical brain regions. The extent to which transmission of this rhythm is dependent on feedforward (bottom-up) or feedback (top-down) mechanisms is unclear. Previously, we have shown that the olfactory bulb (OB), known to orchestrate oscillations in many brain regions, is an important node in the NMDA receptor-dependent HFO network. Since the piriform cortex (PC) receives major input from the OB, and can modulate OB activity via feedback projections, it represents an ideal site to investigate transmission modalities. Here we show, using silicon probes, that NMDA receptor antagonist HFO are present in the PC associated with current dipoles, although of lower power than the OB. Granger causality and peak-lag analyses implicated the OB as the driver of HFO in the PC. Consistent with this, reversible inhibition of the OB resulted in a reduction of HFO power both locally and in the PC. In contrast, inhibition of the PC had minimal impact on OB activity. Collectively, these findings point to bottom-up mechanisms in mediating the transmission of NMDA receptor antagonist-HFO, at least in olfactory circuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.