ArticleScientific reports2024
Identifying severe community-acquired pneumonia using radiomics and clinical data: a machine learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of severe pediatric community-acquired pneumonia using multimodal fusion of chest radiographs and clinical data.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- An interpretable radiomics-machine learning model for early risk stratification of invasive fungal infections in community-acquired pneumonia: a dual-center study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prognosis of pediatric bacterial pneumonia: current advances and challenges.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Multimodal AI-based 28-day mortality prediction of pneumonia patients at ED discharge: a multicenter study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pneumonia: Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction.Current pulmonology reports · 2026Review
- Development and internal evaluation of an interpretable machine learning model based on clinical and radiomics features to differentiate lower extremity arterial embolism from atherothrombosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning model for predicting severe infection in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: multicenter retrospective study.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Risk factors for severe COVID-19 and development of a predictive model.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an early diagnosis model for severe mycoplasma pneumonia in children based on interpretable machine learning.Respiratory research · 2025Article
- Deep learning and radiomics-driven algorithm for automated identification of May-Thurner syndrome in Iliac CTV imaging.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Hyaluronic Acid is Associated with Severity and Prognosis in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evaluating Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) is crucial for determining appropriate treatment methods. In this study, we established a machine learning model using radiomics and clinical features to rapidly and accurately identify Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia (SCAP). A total of 174 CAP patients were included in the study, with 64 cases classified as SCAP. Radiomic features were extracted from chest CT scans using radiomics techniques, and screened to remove irrelevant features. Additionally, clinical indicators of patients were similarly screened and constituted the clinical feature set. Subsequently, eight common machine learning models were employed to complete the SCAP identification task. Specifically, interpretability analysis was conducted on the models. In the end, we screened out 15 radiomic features (such as LeastAxisLength, Maximum2DDiameterColumn and ZonePercentage) and two clinical features: Lymphocyte (p = 0.041) and Albumin (p = 0.044). Using radiomic features as inputs in model predictions yielded the highest AUC of 0.85 on the test set. When using the clinical feature set as model inputs, the AUC was 0.82. Combining the two sets of features as model inputs, Ada Boost achieved the best performance with an AUC of 0.89. Our study demonstrates that combining radiomics and clinical data using machine learning methods can more accurately identify SCAP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.