Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39300038›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2025

Robotic Assisted Transcranial Doppler Monitoring in Acute Neurovascular Care: A Feasibility and Safety Study.

Alvise Fattorello Salimbeni, Caterina Kulyk, Francesco Favruzzo, Ludovica De Rosa, Federica Viaro, Alessio Pieroni, Stefano Mozzetta, Milan R Vosko, Claudio Baracchini

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alvise Fattorello Salimbeni *Stroke Unit and Neurosonology Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua School of Medicine, Via Giustiniani 2, Padua, Italy. a.fattorellosalimbeni@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0002-0521-5118
Caterina Kulyk *Stroke Unit and Neurosonology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Kepler University Hospital GmbH, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Francesco FavruzzoStroke Unit and Neurosonology Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua School of Medicine, Via Giustiniani 2, Padua, Italy.
Ludovica De RosaStroke Unit and Neurosonology Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua School of Medicine, Via Giustiniani 2, Padua, Italy.
Federica ViaroStroke Unit and Neurosonology Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua School of Medicine, Via Giustiniani 2, Padua, Italy.
Alessio PieroniStroke Unit and Neurosonology Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua School of Medicine, Via Giustiniani 2, Padua, Italy.
Stefano MozzettaStroke Unit and Neurosonology Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua School of Medicine, Via Giustiniani 2, Padua, Italy.
Milan R VoskoStroke Unit and Neurosonology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Kepler University Hospital GmbH, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Claudio BaracchiniStroke Unit and Neurosonology Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua School of Medicine, Via Giustiniani 2, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscranial color Doppler (TCD) is currently the only noninvasive bedside tool capable of providing real-time information on cerebral hemodynamics. However, being operator dependent, TCD monitoring is not feasible in many institutions. Robotic assisted TCD (ra-TCD) was recently developed to overcome these constraints. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of cerebral monitoring with a novel ra-TCD in acute neurovascular care.

methodsThis is a two-center prospective study conducted between August 2021 and February 2022 at Padua University Hospital (Padua, Italy) and Kepler University Hospital (Linz, Austria). Adult patients with conditions impacting cerebral hemodynamics or patients undergoing invasive procedures affecting cerebral hemodynamics were recruited for prolonged monitoring (> 30 min) of the middle cerebral artery with a novel ra-TCD (NovaGuide Intelligent Ultrasound, NeuraSignal, Los Angeles, CA). Manual TCD was also performed for comparison by an experienced operator. Feasibility and safety rates were recorded.

resultsA total of 92 patients (age: mean 68.5 years, range 36-91; sex: male 57 [62%]) were enrolled in the two centers: 54 in Padua, 38 in Linz. The examination was feasible in the majority of patients (85.9%); the head cradle design and its radiopacity hindered its use during carotid endarterectomy and mechanical thrombectomy. Regarding safety, only one patient (1.1%) reported a minor local edema due to prolonged probe pressure. Velocity values were similar between ra-TCD and manual TCD.

conclusionsThis novel ra-TCD showed an excellent safety and feasibility and proved to be as reliable as manual TCD in detecting blood flow velocities. These findings support its wider use for cerebral hemodynamics monitoring in acute neurovascular care. However, further technical improvements are needed to expand the range of applicable settings.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationCritical CareMiddle Cerebral ArteryRoboticsUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurophysiological MonitoringProspective StudiesArtificial intelligenceCerebral hemodynamicsFeasibilityNeuromonitoringRoboticSafetyTranscranial ultrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.