ArticleClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2024
Responses to Valsalva's maneuver in spinal cord injury do not broadly relate to vasoconstrictor capacity.
Article in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeA blood pressure stabilization during late phase II of Valsalva's maneuver may be utilized to confirm sympathetic vasoconstrictor control after a spinal cord injury. This study investigated whether Valsalva response was predictive of hemodynamics during tilt or isometric handgrip.
methodsPresence/absence of Valsalva response was compared to heart rate, mean arterial pressure, leg blood flow, and vascular resistance during head-up tilt and isometric handgrip to fatigue in 14 adults with spinal cord injury from C7 to T12 and 14 controls. Statistics were performed with two-way repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA), post hoc t-tests for between-group comparisons, and Mann-Whitney U tests for within-group.
resultsIn total, six participants with spinal cord injury lacked a blood pressure stabilization for Valsalva's maneuver. However, this was not related to vasoconstrictor responses during the other tests. The groups had similar heart rate and blood pressure changes during tilt, though leg blood flow decreases and vascular resistance increases tended to be smaller at 20° tilt in those with spinal cord injury (p = 0.07 and p = 0.11, respectively). Participants with spinal cord injury had lower heart rates and markedly smaller blood pressure increases during handgrip (both p < 0.05). There were no group differences in leg blood flow, but those with spinal cord injury demonstrated a blunted vascular resistance increase by the final 10% of the handgrip (p < 0.01).
conclusionsValsalva response was not consistent with hemodynamics during other stimuli, but some individuals evidence increases in sub-lesional vascular resistance to isometric handgrip comparable to controls, suggesting a sympathoexcitatory stimulus may be critical to provoke hemodynamic responses after spinal cord injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39300002What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.