Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39299986›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2025

Pump-driven clinical infusions: laboratory comparison of pump types, fluid composition and flow rates on model drug delivery applying a new quantitative tool, the pharmacokinetic coefficient of short-term variation (PK-CV).

Anders Steen Knudsen, David E Arney, Robert D Butterfield, Nathaniel M Sims, Vineeth Chandran Suja, Robert A Peterfreund

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Performance Evaluation of a Novel Digital Flow-Imaging IV Infusion Device.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anders Steen KnudsenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
David E ArneyDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Robert D ButterfieldRDB Consulting, Poway, CA, 92064, USA.
Nathaniel M SimsDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Vineeth Chandran SujaSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, 150 Western Avenue, Boston, MA, 02134, USA.
Robert A PeterfreundDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Jackson 439, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. RPeterfreund@MGH.Harvard.Edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9075-5014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critically ill or anesthetized patients commonly receive pump-driven intravenous infusions of potent, fast-acting, short half-life medications for managing hemodynamics. Stepwise dosing, e.g. over 3-5 min, adjusts physiologic responses. Flow rates range from < 0.1 to > 30 ml/h, depending on pump type (large volume, syringe) and drug concentration. Most drugs are formulated in aqueous solutions. Hydrophobic drugs are formulated as lipid emulsions. Do the physical and chemical properties of emulsions impact delivery compared to aqueous solutions? Does stepwise dose titration by the pump correlate with predicted plasma concentrations? Precise, gravimetric, flow rate measurement compared delivery of a 20% lipid emulsion (LE) and 0.9% saline (NS) using different pump types and flow rates. We measured stepwise delivery and then computed predicted plasma concentrations following stepwise dose titration. We measured the pharmacokinetic coefficient of short-term variation, (PK-CV), to assess pump performance. LE and NS had similar mean flow rates in stepwise rate increments and decrements between 0.5 and 32 ml/h and continuous flows 0.5 and 5 ml/h. Pharmacokinetic computation predictions suggest delayed achievement of intended plasma levels following dose titrations. Syringe pumps exhibited smaller variations in PK-CV than large volume pumps. Pump-driven deliveries of lipid emulsion and aqueous solution behave similarly. At low flow rates we observed large flow rate variability differences between pump types showing they may not be interchangeable. PK-CV analysis provides a quantitative tool to assess infusion pump performance. Drug plasma concentrations may lag behind intent of pump dose titration.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsInfusion PumpsEmulsionsEquipment DesignFat Emulsions, IntravenousHemodynamicsHumansInfusions, IntravenousPharmacokineticsSyringesEmulsionsFat Emulsions, IntravenousClinical infusion pumpDrug solubilityFlow rate variabilityLipid emulsionPharmacokinetic coefficient of short-term variation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.