Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39299967›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Anatomy-based fitting improves speech perception in noise for cochlear implant recipients with single-sided deafness.

Anja Kurz, David Herrmann, Franz-Tassilo Müller-Graff, Johannes Voelker, Stephan Hackenberg, Kristen Rak

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06734039 (Impact of Anatomy-Based Frequency), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06734039 naenrolling by invitationnot on this map

Impact of Anatomy-Based Frequency (ABF) Allocations on Early Performance Outcomes in MED-EL Cochlear Implant Recipients

TypeinterventionalSponsorMed-El CorporationRan2025 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsHearing Loss, Unilateral, Cochlear Implants, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Single-Sided Deafness (SSD)ArmsProgramming of cochlear implant audio processor frequency settings
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Prediction accuracy of cochlear implant electrode insertion using the OTOPLAN software.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring Anatomy-Based Fitting for Cochlear Implantation: A Narrative Review.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anja KurzDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. Kurz_A@ukw.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5666-0903
David HerrmannDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Franz-Tassilo Müller-GraffDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Johannes VoelkerDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Stephan HackenbergDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Kristen RakDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate objective and subjective hearing outcomes in experienced cochlear implant users with single sided deafness (SSD CI) who used fitting maps created via anatomy-based fitting (ABF) and clinically-based fitting (CBF).

participantsTwelve SSD CI users with postlingual hearing loss.

interventionOTOPLAN (Version 3. (MED-EL) was used to determine intracochlear electrode contact positions using post-operative high-resolution flat panel volume computed tomography. From these positions, the corresponding center frequencies and bandwidths were derived for each channel. These were implemented in the clinical fitting software MAESTRO to yield an ABF map individualized to each user.

main outcome measuresABF and CBF maps were compared. Objective speech perception in quiet and in noise, binaural effects, and self-perceived sound quality were evaluated.

resultsSignificantly higher speech perception in noise scores were observed with the ABF map compared to the CBF map (mean SRT

conclusionsExperienced SSD CI users preferred using the ABF map, which gave them significant improvements in binaural hearing and some aspects of speech perception.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsHearing Loss, UnilateralProsthesis FittingSpeech PerceptionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoiseTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnatomy-based fittingCochlear implant in single sided deafnessFrequency-to-place mismatchSpeech perception

Identifiers

PMID39299967
PMCPMC11735480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.