Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39299957›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Children Are Not Small Adults: Addressing Limited Generalizability of an Adult Deep Learning CT Organ Segmentation Model to the Pediatric Population.

Devina Chatterjee, Adway Kanhere, Florence X Doo, Jerry Zhao, Andrew Chan, Alexander Welsh, Pranav Kulkarni, Annie Trang, Vishwa S Parekh, Paul H Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Devina Chatterjee *Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Adway Kanhere *Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Florence X DooDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jerry ZhaoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Andrew ChanDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alexander WelshDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pranav KulkarniDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Annie TrangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Vishwa S ParekhDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Paul H YiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, 38105 TN, USA. paul.yi@stjude.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9433-8093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) tools developed on adult data sets may not generalize well to pediatric patients, posing potential safety risks. We evaluated the performance of TotalSegmentator, a state-of-the-art adult-trained CT organ segmentation model, on a subset of organs in a pediatric CT dataset and explored optimization strategies to improve pediatric segmentation performance. TotalSegmentator was retrospectively evaluated on abdominal CT scans from an external adult dataset (n = 300) and an external pediatric data set (n = 359). Generalizability was quantified by comparing Dice scores between adult and pediatric external data sets using Mann-Whitney U tests. Two DL optimization approaches were then evaluated: (1) 3D nnU-Net model trained on only pediatric data, and (2) an adult nnU-Net model fine-tuned on the pediatric cases. Our results show TotalSegmentator had significantly lower overall mean Dice scores on pediatric vs. adult CT scans (0.73 vs. 0.81, P < .001) demonstrating limited generalizability to pediatric CT scans. Stratified by organ, there was lower mean pediatric Dice score for four organs (P < .001, all): right and left adrenal glands (right adrenal, 0.41 [0.39-0.43] vs. 0.69 [0.66-0.71]; left adrenal, 0.35 [0.32-0.37] vs. 0.68 [0.65-0.71]); duodenum (0.47 [0.45-0.49] vs. 0.67 [0.64-0.69]); and pancreas (0.73 [0.72-0.74] vs. 0.79 [0.77-0.81]). Performance on pediatric CT scans improved by developing pediatric-specific models and fine-tuning an adult-trained model on pediatric images where both methods significantly improved segmentation accuracy over TotalSegmentator for all organs, especially for smaller anatomical structures (e.g., > 0.2 higher mean Dice for adrenal glands; P < .001).

Indexed as

Deep LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesAge biasModel generalizabilityMulti-Organ image segmentationTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID39299957
PMCPMC12092917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.