Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39299953›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

AI-based lumbar central canal stenosis classification on sagittal MR images is comparable to experienced radiologists using axial images.

Jasper W van der Graaf, Liron Brundel, Miranda L van Hooff, Marinus de Kleuver, Nikolas Lessmann, Bas J Maresch, Myrthe M Vestering, Jacco Spermon, Bram van Ginneken, Matthieu J C M Rutten

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. AI for Lesion Detection in Musculoskeletal Radiology.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jasper W van der Graaf *Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. jasper.vandergraaf@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8684-5175
Liron Brundel *Department of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Miranda L van HooffDepartment of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marinus de KleuverDepartment of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nikolas LessmannDiagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bas J MareschDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands.
Myrthe M VesteringDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands.
Jacco SpermonDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands.
Bram van GinnekenDiagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Matthieu J C M RuttenDiagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe assessment of lumbar central canal stenosis (LCCS) is crucial for diagnosing and planning treatment for patients with low back pain and neurogenic pain. However, manual assessment methods are time-consuming, variable, and require axial MRIs. The aim of this study is to develop and validate an AI-based model that automatically classifies LCCS using sagittal T2-weighted MRIs.

methodsA pre-existing 3D AI algorithm was utilized to segment the spinal canal and intervertebral discs (IVDs), enabling quantitative measurements at each IVD level. Four musculoskeletal radiologists graded 683 IVD levels from 186 LCCS patients using the 4-class Lee grading system. A second consensus reading was conducted by readers 1 and 2, which, along with automatic measurements, formed the training dataset for a multiclass (grade 0-3) and binary (grade 0-1 vs. 2-3) random forest classifier with tenfold cross-validation.

resultsThe multiclass model achieved a Cohen's weighted kappa of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82-0.90), comparable to readers 3 and 4 with 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.89) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68-0.79) respectively. The binary model demonstrated an AUC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97-0.99), sensitivity of 93% (95% CI: 91-96%), and specificity of 91% (95% CI: 87-95%). In comparison, readers 3 and 4 achieved a specificity of 98 and 99% and sensitivity of 74 and 54%, respectively.

conclusionBoth the multiclass and binary models, while only using sagittal MR images, perform on par with experienced radiologists who also had access to axial sequences. This underscores the potential of this novel algorithm in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in medical imaging. KEY POINTS: Question How can the classification of lumbar central canal stenosis (LCCS) be made more efficient? Findings Multiclass and binary AI models, using only sagittal MR images, performed on par with experienced radiologists who also had access to axial sequences. Clinical relevance Our AI algorithm accurately classifies LCCS from sagittal MRI, matching experienced radiologists. This study offers a promising tool for automated LCCS assessment from sagittal T2 MRI, potentially reducing the reliance on additional axial imaging.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpinal StenosisAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiologistsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityDeep learningLumbar central canal stenosisMachine learningMRISpine

Identifiers

PMID39299953
PMCPMC11913898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.