ReviewMagyar onkologia2024
[Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy].
Review in Magyar onkologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physiotherapy for Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy: Current Evidence and Therapeutic Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Efficacy of Modified Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Intrafascial Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer and Analysis of Factors Influencing Postoperative Urinary Continence Recovery.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- The clinical efficacy evaluation of preoperative NHT treatment in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the most commonly seen malignancies. Radical prostatectomy - open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted - is considered the first-line treatment for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer, along with radiotherapy, if the expected survival is greater than 10 years. Radical prostatectomy is also considered in case of low-risk patients alongside active follow-up. Today, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is the most common surgical treatment for localised prostate cancer. It is associated with shorter hospitalisation times and lower transfusion requirements compared to open surgery. Satisfactory long-term biochemical recurrence-free survival and tumour-specific survival can be achieved with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the treatment of low-, intermediate- and highrisk prostate cancer. It has the advantage of rapid postoperative continence recovery and high potency recovery rates. The cost of the minimal invasive approach is higher compared to open radical prostatectomy, and the benefits of faster postoperative recovery should be further investigated to quantify cost-effectiveness. The robot-assisted approach has enabled a number of new surgical techniques and further rapid advances in this field are expected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39299693PMC11870689What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.