Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39299690›Full record

ArticleMagyar onkologia2024

[Trends of minimally invasive surgical techniques in endometrial carcinoma at the National Institute of Oncology (2016-2024)].

Judit Kerepesi, Júlia Kőrösi, Bahrehmand Kiarash, Zoltán Novák

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Magyar onkologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Judit KerepesiNőgyógyászati Osztály, Országos Onkológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary. kerepesi.judit@oncol.hu.
Júlia KőrösiNőgyógyászati Osztály, Országos Onkológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary. kerepesi.judit@oncol.hu.
Bahrehmand KiarashNőgyógyászati Osztály, Országos Onkológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary. kerepesi.judit@oncol.hu.
Zoltán NovákNőgyógyászati Osztály, Országos Onkológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary. kerepesi.judit@oncol.hu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the trends and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the treatment of endometrial carcinoma at the National Institute of Oncology, Department of Gynecology, from 2016 to 2023. This retrospective study included patients with endometrial carcinoma stages I-IV who underwent primary surgical treatment between 2016 and 2023. The techniques analyzed were total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), robotic- assisted hysterectomy (RAH), and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). A total of 1127 patients were included. The number of minimally invasive surgeries increased significantly: in 2016, there were 69 laparotomies and 1 TLH, while in 2023, there were 57 laparotomies, 19 TLHs and 123 robotic-assisted hysterectomies. As a conclusion, the use of minimally invasive techniques significantly increased in the treatment of endometrial carcinoma. The entire team, including anesthesiologists, gained experience in managing morbidly obese patients, enabling safe minimally invasive surgeries.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsHysterectomyLaparoscopyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39299690
PMCPMC11870679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.