Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39299687›Full record

ReviewMagyar onkologia2024

[Robot-assisted esophageal surgery].

András Papp, Zsolt Dubóczki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magyar onkologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

András PappKlinikai Központ, Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Sebészeti Klinika, Pécs, Hungary. papp.andras@pte.hu.
Zsolt DubóczkiOrszágos Onkológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophageal surgery (RAMIE) represents a significant advancement in minimally invasive surgery. The robot system typically includes a high-resolution 3D camera and specially maneuverable instruments that are controlled by the surgeon from a console. By reducing the trauma caused by the intervention, this method allows for faster recovery compared to traditional open surgeries. Furthermore, the increased range of motion provided by the robot instruments enables more precise manipulations in the area of the esophagus and surrounding tissues, thereby improving the effectiveness of tumor resections and reconstructions. The results of clinical trials are promising: there is a decrease in postoperative pain, a lower risk of complications, and a shorter hospital stay, while the oncological outcomes are at least equivalent to open surgeries. As technology advances, robot-assisted esophageal surgery is expected to spread more widely, providing better patient care and surgical outcomes for both benign and malignant esophageal diseases.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresEsophageal DiseasesHumansLength of StayMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative PainRoboticsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39299687
PMCPMC11870682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.