Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39299685›Full record

ReviewMagyar onkologia2024

[The path leading to robotic surgery].

Attila Szijártó, Klára Lévay, Damján Pekli

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Magyar onkologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Attila SzijártóSebészeti, Transzplantációs és Gasztroenterológiai Klinika, Semmelweis Egyetem, Budapest, Hungary. szijarto.attila@semmelweis.hu.
Klára LévaySebészeti, Transzplantációs és Gasztroenterológiai Klinika, Semmelweis Egyetem, Budapest, Hungary. szijarto.attila@semmelweis.hu.
Damján PekliSebészeti, Transzplantációs és Gasztroenterológiai Klinika, Semmelweis Egyetem, Budapest, Hungary. szijarto.attila@semmelweis.hu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic surgery, as a type of minimally invasive surgery, is applied in the medical care, and offers numerous benefits for patients. In this article, the development and changes in robotics, and the aim of robot manufacturing will be reviewed. Furthermore, by summarizing the history of the surgical field, we are going to describe the main paradigm shifts, which show the human acceptance and usage of novel ideas in Europe and in the USA. As a summary, the complex structure, place in surgery and the advantages of the surgical robots and some state-of-the-art research projects will be described, to let us forecast the surgical field of the future.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresEuropeHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansLaparoscopyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39299685
PMCPMC11870696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.