Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39299620›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2024

Automated data-driven discovery of material models based on symbolic regression: A case study on the human brain cortex.

Jixin Hou, Xianyan Chen, Taotao Wu, Ellen Kuhl, Xianqiao Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimal experimental design for repeatable hyperelastic material characterization.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jixin HouSchool of Environmental, Civil, Agricultural and Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Xianyan ChenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Taotao WuSchool of Chemical, Materials, and Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Ellen KuhlDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Xianqiao WangSchool of Environmental, Civil, Agricultural and Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. Electronic address: xqwang@uga.edu.

Funding

The Gut Microbiome and Serum Metabolites as a Biological Mechanism Underlying Pain in Kidney Transplantation (Biome-KT)R01DK135574 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI Mark Lockwood · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
SCH: Using Data-Driven Computational Biomechanics to Disentangle Brain Structural Commonality, Variability, and Abnormality in ASDR01NS135574 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI Xianqiao Wang · 2023 to 2026
$1.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK135574NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS135574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce a data-driven framework to automatically identify interpretable and physically meaningful hyperelastic constitutive models from sparse data. Leveraging symbolic regression, our approach generates elegant hyperelastic models that achieve accurate data fitting with parsimonious mathematic formulas, while strictly adhering to hyperelasticity constraints such as polyconvexity/ellipticity. Our investigation spans three distinct hyperelastic models-invariant-based, principal stretch-based, and normal strain-based-and highlights the versatility of symbolic regression. We validate our new approach using synthetic data from five classic hyperelastic models and experimental data from the human brain cortex to demonstrate algorithmic efficacy. Our results suggest that our symbolic regression algorithms robustly discover accurate models with succinct mathematic expressions in invariant-based, stretch-based, and strain-based scenarios. Strikingly, the strain-based model exhibits superior accuracy, while both stretch-based and strain-based models effectively capture the nonlinearity and tension-compression asymmetry inherent to the human brain tissue. Polyconvexity/ellipticity assessment affirm the rigorous adherence to convexity requirements both within and beyond the training regime. However, the stretch-based models raise concerns regarding potential convexity loss under large deformations. The evaluation of predictive capabilities demonstrates remarkable interpolation capabilities for all three models and acceptable extrapolation performance for stretch-based and strain-based models. Finally, robustness tests on noise-embedded data underscore the reliability of our symbolic regression algorithms. Our study confirms the applicability and accuracy of symbolic regression in the automated discovery of isotropic hyperelastic models for the human brain and gives rise to a wide variety of applications in other soft matter systems. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Our research introduces a pioneering data-driven framework that revolutionizes the automated identification of hyperelastic constitutive models, particularly in the context of soft matter systems such as the human brain. By harnessing the power of symbolic regression, we have unlocked the ability to distill intricate physical phenomena into elegant and interpretable mathematical expressions. Our approach not only ensures accurate fitting to sparse data but also upholds crucial hyperelasticity constraints, including polyconvexity, essential for maintaining physical relevance.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCerebral CortexElasticityHumansModels, BiologicalRegression AnalysisConstitutive modelingHyperelasticityModel discoveryPolyconvexitySymbolic regression

Identifiers

PMID39299620
PMCPMC12205916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.