ArticleActa biomaterialia2024
Automated data-driven discovery of material models based on symbolic regression: A case study on the human brain cortex.
Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal experimental design for repeatable hyperelastic material characterization.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2025Article
- Mechanical characterization of brain tissue: experimental techniques, human testing considerations, and perspectives.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Review
- Integrating machine learning and symbolic regression for predicting damage initiation in hybrid FRP bolted connections.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring hyperelastic material model discovery for human brain cortex: Multivariate analysis vs. artificial neural network approaches.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We introduce a data-driven framework to automatically identify interpretable and physically meaningful hyperelastic constitutive models from sparse data. Leveraging symbolic regression, our approach generates elegant hyperelastic models that achieve accurate data fitting with parsimonious mathematic formulas, while strictly adhering to hyperelasticity constraints such as polyconvexity/ellipticity. Our investigation spans three distinct hyperelastic models-invariant-based, principal stretch-based, and normal strain-based-and highlights the versatility of symbolic regression. We validate our new approach using synthetic data from five classic hyperelastic models and experimental data from the human brain cortex to demonstrate algorithmic efficacy. Our results suggest that our symbolic regression algorithms robustly discover accurate models with succinct mathematic expressions in invariant-based, stretch-based, and strain-based scenarios. Strikingly, the strain-based model exhibits superior accuracy, while both stretch-based and strain-based models effectively capture the nonlinearity and tension-compression asymmetry inherent to the human brain tissue. Polyconvexity/ellipticity assessment affirm the rigorous adherence to convexity requirements both within and beyond the training regime. However, the stretch-based models raise concerns regarding potential convexity loss under large deformations. The evaluation of predictive capabilities demonstrates remarkable interpolation capabilities for all three models and acceptable extrapolation performance for stretch-based and strain-based models. Finally, robustness tests on noise-embedded data underscore the reliability of our symbolic regression algorithms. Our study confirms the applicability and accuracy of symbolic regression in the automated discovery of isotropic hyperelastic models for the human brain and gives rise to a wide variety of applications in other soft matter systems. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Our research introduces a pioneering data-driven framework that revolutionizes the automated identification of hyperelastic constitutive models, particularly in the context of soft matter systems such as the human brain. By harnessing the power of symbolic regression, we have unlocked the ability to distill intricate physical phenomena into elegant and interpretable mathematical expressions. Our approach not only ensures accurate fitting to sparse data but also upholds crucial hyperelasticity constraints, including polyconvexity, essential for maintaining physical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.