ArticleJournal of affective disorders2025
Personalized assessment of eating disorder cognitions during treatment: A new measure of cognitive pathology change.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveModifying cognitive distortions, or thinking errors, is crucial in eating disorders (ED) treatment. To address the lack of a personalized measure for ED cognitions, the Thought Inventory was developed. The study aimed to establish its feasibility and validity, identify thinking error contents and types, examine changes in belief of irrational thoughts, and investigate associations with change in ED symptoms. Hypotheses, procedure, and planned analyses were pre-registered to ensure transparency.
methodsParticipants (N = 55) completed the Thought Inventory, the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, the Eating Pathology Symptom Inventory, the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire at pre-and post-ten weeks of treatment. Using the Thought Inventory, participants collaborated with study therapists to identify ED-related thinking errors and rate the degree of belief in these thoughts on a scale of 0 to 100 %.
resultsCognitions primarily contained self-judgments, food rules, and concern over shape, while catastrophizing/fortune telling, emotional reasoning, and should/must statements were the most common types of thinking errors. Belief in cognitions significantly decreased over treatment and change in thought belief was positively associated with change in ED symptoms.
conclusionThe Thought Inventory shows promise as a personalized measure. Future research should explore whether ED cognitions, assessed in this manner, are a mechanism of change in ED treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.