Association between Congenital Anomalies and Late-Onset Bacterial Infections in Neonates Admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Australia and New Zealand: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

Antibiotic exposure in culture-negative preterm infants: a 10-year single-centre study.Pediatric research · 2026
Article
Identifying Infants <32 Weeks' Gestation at Low Risk of Early-Onset Sepsis: A 10-Year Retrospective Study from Western Australia.Neonatology · 2026
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abrar Ahmad ChughtaiSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, abrar.chughtai@unsw.edu.au.

Naomi SpotswoodWomen's and Children's Services, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

Tobias StrunkNeonatal Directorate, Child and Adolescent Health Service, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Washington, Australia.

Trisha ParmarRoyal Hospital for Women, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Tim SchindlerRoyal Hospital for Women, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Himanshu PopatGrace Centre for Newborn Intensive Care, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, NHMRC Clinical Trial Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Sharon Sue Wen ChowCentre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Kei LuiSchool of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of New South Wales, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCompromised neonatal intensive care unit neonates are at risk of acquiring late-onset infections (late-onset sepsis [LOS]). Neonates born with congenital anomalies (CAs) could have an additional LOS risk.

methodsUtilising the population-based Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network data from 2007 to 2017, bacterial LOS rates were determined in very preterm (VPT, <32 week), moderately preterm (MPT, 32-36 weeks), and term (FT, 37-41 weeks) neonates with or without CA. Stratified by major surgery, the association between CA and bacterial LOS was evaluated.

resultsOf 102,808 neonates, 37.7%, 32.8%, and 29.6% were born VPT, MPT, and FT, respectively. Among these, 3.4% VPT, 7.5% MPT, and 16.2% FT neonates had CA. VPT neonates had the highest LOS rate (11.1%), compared to MPT (1.8%) and FT (1.8%) neonates. LOS rates were higher in CA neonates than those without (8.2% versus 5.1% adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45-1.92). Neonates with surgery had a higher LOS rate (14.2%) than neonates without surgery (4.4%, p < 0.001). Among the neonates without surgery, CA neonates had consistently higher LOS rates than those without CA (VPT 14.3% vs. 9.6% [aRR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.11-1.57]; MPT 4% vs. 0.9% [aRR 4.45, 95% CI: 3.23-6.14]; and FT 2% vs. 0.7% [aRR 2.87, 95% CI: 1.97-4.18]). For the neonates with surgery, CAs were not associated with additional LOS risks.

conclusionOverall, we reported higher rates of LOS in neonates with CA compared to those without CA. Regardless of gestation, CA was associated with an increased LOS risk among non-surgical neonates. Optimisation of infection prevention strategies for CA neonates should be explored. Future studies are needed to evaluate if the infection risk is caused by CA or associated complications.

introductionCompromised neonatal intensive care unit neonates are at risk of acquiring late-onset infections (late-onset sepsis [LOS]). Neonates born with congenital anomalies (CAs) could have an additional LOS risk.

methodsUtilising the population-based Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network data from 2007 to 2017, bacterial LOS rates were determined in very preterm (VPT, <32 week), moderately preterm (MPT, 32-36 weeks), and term (FT, 37-41 weeks) neonates with or without CA. Stratified by major surgery, the association between CA and bacterial LOS was evaluated.

resultsOf 102,808 neonates, 37.7%, 32.8%, and 29.6% were born VPT, MPT, and FT, respectively. Among these, 3.4% VPT, 7.5% MPT, and 16.2% FT neonates had CA. VPT neonates had the highest LOS rate (11.1%), compared to MPT (1.8%) and FT (1.8%) neonates. LOS rates were higher in CA neonates than those without (8.2% versus 5.1% adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45-1.92). Neonates with surgery had a higher LOS rate (14.2%) than neonates without surgery (4.4%, p < 0.001). Among the neonates without surgery, CA neonates had consistently higher LOS rates than those without CA (VPT 14.3% vs. 9.6% [aRR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.11-1.57]; MPT 4% vs. 0.9% [aRR 4.45, 95% CI: 3.23-6.14]; and FT 2% vs. 0.7% [aRR 2.87, 95% CI: 1.97-4.18]). For the neonates with surgery, CAs were not associated with additional LOS risks.

conclusionOverall, we reported higher rates of LOS in neonates with CA compared to those without CA. Regardless of gestation, CA was associated with an increased LOS risk among non-surgical neonates. Optimisation of infection prevention strategies for CA neonates should be explored. Future studies are needed to evaluate if the infection risk is caused by CA or associated complications.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsCongenital AbnormalitiesIntensive Care Units, NeonatalNeonatal SepsisAustraliaCohort StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleNew ZealandRisk FactorsBacterial infectionsBirth defectsCongenital anomaliesInfectionsNeonatal intensive care unitsSepsis