Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39299124›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental management2024

Wetland-mediated nitrate reductions attenuate downstream: Insights from a modeling study.

Rebecca Forgrave, Grey R Evenson, Heather E Golden, Jay R Christensen, Charles R Lane, Qiusheng Wu, Ellen D'Amico, Joseph Prenger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebecca ForgraveOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Research Participation Program, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Electronic address: forgr001@umn.edu.
Grey R EvensonOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Heather E GoldenOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jay R ChristensenOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Charles R LaneOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA, USA.
Qiusheng WuDepartment of Geography and Sustainability, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Ellen D'AmicoPegasus Technical Services, Inc. C/o, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Joseph PrengerNatural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Connections between agricultural runoff and excess nitrogen in the Upper Mississippi River Basin are well-documented, as is the potential role of constructed wetlands in mitigating this surplus nitrogen. However, limited knowledge exists about the "best" placement of these wetlands for downstream nitrogen reductions within a whole watershed context as well as how far downstream these benefits are realized. In this study, we simulate the cumulative impacts of diverse wetland restoration scenarios on downstream nitrate reductions in different subbasins of the Raccoon River Watershed, Iowa, USA, and spatially trace their relative effects downstream. Our simulated results underscore previous work demonstrating that the total area of wetlands and the wetland-catchment-to-wetland area ratio are both significant factors for determining the nitrate load reduction benefits of wetlands at subbasin scales. Simulated wetland conservation scenarios resulted in nitrate load decreases ranging from 7.5 to 43.2% of our baseline model loads. However, we found these wetland-mediated nitrate reduction benefits are quickly attenuated downstream: load reductions were <1% at the watershed outlet across all model scenarios, despite the magnitude of the subbasin-scale nitrate decreases. The relatively rapid attenuation of wetland effects is largely due to downstream nitrate load contributions from untreated subbasins. However, higher subbasin-scale nitrate reductions from wetland-based conservation practices resulted in longer downstream distances prior to attenuation. This study highlights the importance of considering the spatial location of constructed or restored wetlands relative to the area within the watershed where nitrogen reductions are most needed.

Indexed as

NitratesWetlandsAgricultureIowaModels, TheoreticalRiversNitratesConstructed wetlandsNitrate load reductionsNon-floodplain wetlandsSWATWatersheds

Identifiers

PMID39299124
PMCPMC11568908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.