SynthesisInflammatory bowel diseases2025
Impact of Seton Use on Clinical, Patient-Reported, and Healthcare Resource Utilization Outcomes in Complex Crohn's Perianal Fistulas: A Systematic Literature Review.
Synthesis in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Second United Arab Emirates consensus guidance on the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative analysis of early and late recurrence rates in perianal fistula surgery.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOptimal treatment strategies for seton use in patients with Crohn's perianal fistulas (CPF) remain elusive. This systematic literature review aimed to summarize clinical, patient-reported, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) outcomes associated with seton use for symptomatic relief and treatment of complex CPF.
methodsElectronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, EBM Reviews, EconLit) were searched. Titles, abstracts, and relevant full texts were screened by 2 reviewers for inclusion using prespecified PICOS-T criteria. Articles published in English between January 1, 1980 and September 6, 2021 were included; animal/in vitro studies and case reports with <5 patients were excluded. Outcomes of interest included rates of complete response/remission and fistula recurrence in patients receiving seton with/without infliximab or biologics. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics.
resultsOverall, 56 studies were included (full texts: n = 43; congress abstracts: n = 13). CPF and clinical outcome definitions were heterogeneous. Rates (range) of complete response/remission varied widely (seton: 13%-75%; seton + infliximab: 23%-100%; seton + biologics: 23%-59%) as did rates for fistula recurrence (seton: 4%-68%; seton + infliximab: 0%-50%; seton + biologics: 0%-17%). Rates of fistula-related reintervention, new fistula or abscess formation, and abscess recurrence were also varied; more consistency was observed regarding the use of patient-reported outcomes. Few studies reported outcomes from pediatric/adolescent patients or HCRU.
conclusionsOptimal use of seton in patients with CPF remains unclear. International standardization of definitions for CPF and related clinical outcomes are required to permit data comparability and identify the most effective treatment strategies involving seton use in CPF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.