Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39298534›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

PUPAID: A R + ImageJ pipeline for thorough and semi-automated processing and analysis of multi-channel immunofluorescence data.

Paul Régnier, Camille Montardi, Anna Maciejewski-Duval, Cindy Marques, David Saadoun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul RégnierImmunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (i3) Laboratory, INSERM UMR-S 959, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9713-1132
Camille MontardiDépartement de Médecine Interne, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris Saclay, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Anna Maciejewski-DuvalImmunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (i3) Laboratory, INSERM UMR-S 959, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Cindy MarquesImmunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (i3) Laboratory, INSERM UMR-S 959, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
David SaadounImmunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (i3) Laboratory, INSERM UMR-S 959, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PUPAID is a workflow written in R + ImageJ languages which is dedicated to the semi-automated processing and analysis of multi-channel immunofluorescence data. The workflow is designed to extract fluorescence signals within automatically-segmented cells, defined here as Areas of Interest (AOI), on whole multi-layer slides (or eventually cropped sections of them), defined here as Regions of Interest (ROI), in a simple and understandable yet thorough manner. The included (but facultative) R Shiny-based interactive application makes PUPAID also suitable for scientists who are not fluent with R programming. Furthermore, we show that PUPAID identifies significantly more cells, especially in high-density regions, as compared to already published state-of-the-art methods such as StarDist or Cellpose. For extended possibilities and downstream compatibility, single cell information is exported as FCS files (the standardized file format for single cell-based cytometry data) in order to be openable using any third-party cytometry analysis software or any analysis workflow which takes FCS files as input.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwareAnimalsAutomationFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumans

Identifiers

PMID39298534
PMCPMC11412663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.