ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2025
An in vitro and machine learning framework for quantifying serum albumin binding of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward Comprehensive In Vitro Evaluation of Serum Albumin Binding of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Review
- The Impact of Forever Chemicals on Protein Structure and Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- NAMs for closing knowledge gaps in assessment of respiratory uptake - a PARC project.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
- PFAS exposure and reproductive dysfunction: implications for outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- QSAR and machine learning methods for prediction of albumin-ligand binding.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a diverse class of anthropogenic chemicals; many are persistent, bioaccumulative, and mobile in the environment. Worldwide, PFAS bioaccumulation causes serious adverse health impacts, yet the physiochemical determinants of bioaccumulation and toxicity for most PFAS are not well understood, largely due to experimental data deficiencies. As most PFAS are proteinophilic, protein binding is a critical parameter for predicting PFAS bioaccumulation and toxicity. Among these proteins, human serum albumin (HSA) is the predominant blood transport protein for many PFAS. We previously demonstrated the utility of an in vitro differential scanning fluorimetry assay for determining relative HSA binding affinities for 24 PFAS. Here, we report HSA affinities for 65 structurally diverse PFAS from 20 chemical classes. We leverage these experimental data, and chemical/molecular descriptors of PFAS, to build 7 machine learning classifier algorithms and 9 regression algorithms, and evaluate their performance to identify the best predictive binding models. Evaluation of model accuracy revealed that the top-performing classifier model, logistic regression, had an AUROC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) statistic of 0.936. The top-performing regression model, support vector regression, had an R2 of 0.854. These top-performing models were then used to predict HSA-PFAS binding for chemicals in the EPAPFASINV list of 430 PFAS. These developed in vitro and in silico methodologies represent a high-throughput framework for predicting protein-PFAS binding based on empirical data, and generate directly comparable binding data of potential use in predictive modeling of PFAS bioaccumulation and other toxicokinetic endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.