Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39298501›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Congenital transmission of Chagas disease: The role of newborn therapy on the disease's dynamics.

Meriem Boukaabar, Bismark Oduro, Paul Chataa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meriem BoukaabarDepartment of Mathematics, Pennsylvania Western University, California, PA, United States of America.
Bismark OduroDepartment of Mathematics, Pennsylvania Western University, California, PA, United States of America.
Paul ChataaDepartment of Mathematics, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID 0009-0002-5595-2132

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chagas disease, also known as American trypanosomiasis, is caused by a protozoan blood-borne pathogen called Trypanosoma cruzi. The World Health Organization (WHO) has classified Chagas as one of 21 neglected tropical diseases present in the world and estimates that 6-7 million people are currently infected with Chagas. Congenital transmission of Chagas disease contributes to a significant amount of new infections, especially in endemic areas where 22.5% of new infections are due to congenital transmission. In this paper, we investigate congenital transmission's impact on Chagas disease dynamics through a mathematical model. Specifically, we examine how treating a proportion of infants born to infected individuals impacts the progression and spread of Chagas disease. The influence of newborn therapy on the dynamics of the model is thoroughly investigated, both theoretically and numerically. The results illustrate the importance of treating a high proportion of newborns to reduce the number of infected cases of the disease. The findings show that the therapy given to newborns is necessary but not sufficient to curb the transmission of Chagas disease, and a comprehensive approach that includes vector and vertical transmission control strategies is essential for eradicating Chagas disease. We also observed that if vector transmission can be controlled, then at least 55% of the newborns need to be treated to eliminate the disease.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalAnimalsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornModels, TheoreticalTrypanocidal AgentsTrypanosoma cruziTrypanocidal Agents

Identifiers

PMID39298501
PMCPMC11412536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.