Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39298487›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Nuclear dualism without extensive DNA elimination in the ciliate

Brandon K B Seah, Aditi Singh, David E Vetter, Christiane Emmerich, Moritz Peters, Volker Soltys, Bruno Huettel, Estienne C Swart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A PIWI protein-dependent DNA N6-adenine methylation pathway inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brandon K B SeahMax Planck Institute for Biology, Tübingen 72076, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1878-4363
Aditi SinghMax Planck Institute for Biology, Tübingen 72076, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7840-9058
David E VetterMax Planck Institute for Biology, Tübingen 72076, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0520-8535
Christiane EmmerichMax Planck Institute for Biology, Tübingen 72076, Germany.
Moritz PetersMax Planck Institute for Biology, Tübingen 72076, Germany.
Volker SoltysMax Planck Institute for Biology, Tübingen 72076, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-4568-3040
Bruno HuettelMax Planck Genome Centre Cologne, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne 50829, Germany.
Estienne C SwartMax Planck Institute for Biology, Tübingen 72076, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1362-1602

Funding

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (MPG)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most eukaryotes have one nucleus and nuclear genome per cell. Ciliates have instead evolved distinct nuclei that coexist in each cell: a silent germline vs. transcriptionally active somatic nuclei. In the best-studied model species, both nuclei can divide asexually, but only germline nuclei undergo meiosis and karyogamy during sex. Thereafter, thousands of DNA segments, called internally eliminated sequences (IESs), are excised from copies of the germline genomes to produce the streamlined somatic genome. In

Indexed as

Cell NucleusCiliophoraDNA, ProtozoanGenome, ProtozoanDNA, ProtozoanCiliophoragenome editingmacronucleusmicronucleusmobile elements

Identifiers

PMID39298487
PMCPMC11441545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.