ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Generative haplotype prediction outperforms statistical methods for small variant detection in next-generation sequencing data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- HCC-derived SNU cell lines as model systems to study HBV life cycle.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Learning-based parallel acceleration for HaplotypeCaller.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationDetection of germline variants in next-generation sequencing data is an essential component of modern genomics analysis. Variant detection tools typically rely on statistical algorithms such as de Bruijn graphs or Hidden Markov models, and are often coupled with heuristic techniques and thresholds to maximize accuracy. Despite significant progress in recent years, current methods still generate thousands of false-positive detections in a typical human whole genome, creating a significant manual review burden.
resultsWe introduce a new approach that replaces the handcrafted statistical techniques of previous methods with a single deep generative model. Using a standard transformer-based encoder and double-decoder architecture, our model learns to construct diploid germline haplotypes in a generative fashion identical to modern large language models. We train our model on 37 whole genome sequences from Genome-in-a-Bottle samples, and demonstrate that our method learns to produce accurate haplotypes with correct phase and genotype for all classes of small variants. We compare our method, called Jenever, to FreeBayes, GATK HaplotypeCaller, Clair3, and DeepVariant, and demonstrate that our method has superior overall accuracy compared to other methods. At F1-maximizing quality thresholds, our model delivers the highest sensitivity, precision, and the fewest genotyping errors for insertion and deletion variants. For single nucleotide variants, our model demonstrates the highest sensitivity but at somewhat lower precision, and achieves the highest overall F1 score among all callers we tested. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Jenever is implemented as a python-based command line tool. Source code is available at https://github.com/ARUP-NGS/jenever/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.