Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39298446›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Hospital discharge processes: Insights from patients, caregivers, and staff in an Australian healthcare setting.

Olumuyiwa Omonaiye, Kristel Ward-Stockham, Peteris Darzins, Clinton Kitt, Evan Newnham, Nicholas F Taylor, Julie Considine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Using Codesign to Develop a Health Literacy Intervention to Improve the Accessibility and Acceptability of Cardiac Services: The Equal Hearts Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olumuyiwa OmonaiyeGeelong: School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8745-0589
Kristel Ward-StockhamCentre for Quality and Patient Safety-Eastern Health Partnership, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Peteris DarzinsEastern Health Institute, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Clinton KittEastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-4848-1268
Evan NewnhamEastern Health Institute, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Nicholas F TaylorEastern Health Institute, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Julie ConsidineGeelong: School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3801-2456

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hospital discharge is a pivotal point in healthcare delivery, impacting patient outcomes and resource utilisation. Ineffective discharge processes contribute to unplanned hospital readmissions. This study explored hospital discharge process from the perspectives of patients, caregivers, and healthcare staff. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with adult patients being discharged home from a medical ward, their caregivers, and healthcare staff at an Australian hospital. Thematic analysis followed established guidelines for qualitative research. A total of 65 interviews and 21 structured observations were completed. There were three themes: i) Communication, ii) System Pressure, and iii) Continuing Care. The theme 'Communication' highlighted challenges and inconsistencies in notifying patients, caregivers, and staff about discharge plans, leading to patient stress and frustration. Information overload during discharge hindered patient comprehension and satisfaction. Staff identified communication gaps between teams, resulting in uncertainty regarding discharge logistics. The theme 'System Pressure' referred to pressure to discharge patients quickly to free hospital capacity occasionally, even in the face of inadequate service provision on weekends and out-of-hours. The 'Continuing Care' theme drew attention to gaps in patient understanding of follow-up appointments, underscoring the need for clearer post-discharge instructions. The lack of structured systems for tracking referrals and post-discharge care coordination was also highlighted, potentially leading to fragmented care. The findings resonate with international literature and the current emphasis in Australia on improving communication during care transitions. Furthermore, the study highlights the tension between patient-centred care and health service pressure for bed availability, resulting in perceptions of premature discharges and unplanned readmissions. It underscores the need for strengthening community-based support and systems for tracking referrals to improve care continuity. These findings have implications for patient experience and safety and suggest the need for targeted interventions to optimise the discharge process.

Indexed as

CaregiversPatient DischargeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCommunicationContinuity of Patient CareDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID39298446
PMCPMC11412517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.