ArticlePloS one2024
Cell-type specific methylation changes in the newborn child associated to obstetric pain relief.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although it is widely known that various pharmaceuticals affect the methylome, the knowledge of the effects from anesthesia is limited, and nearly nonexistent regarding the effects of obstetric anesthesia on the newborn child. Using sequencing based-methylation data and a reference-based statistical deconvolution approach we performed methylome-wide association studies (MWAS) of neonatal whole blood, and for each cell-type specifically, to detect methylation variations that are associated with the pain relief administered to the mother during delivery. Significant findings were replicated in a different dataset and followed-up with gene ontology analysis to pinpoint biological functions of potential relevance to these neonatal methylation alterations. The MWAS analyses detected methylome-wide significant (q<0.1) alterations in the newborn for laughing gas in granulocytes (two CpGs, p<5.50x10-9, q = 0.067), and for pudendal block in monocytes (five CpGs across three loci, p<1.51 x10-8, q = 0.073). Suggestively significant findings (p<1.00x10-6) were detected for both treatments for bulk and all cell-types, and replication analyses showed consistent significant enrichment (odds ratios ranging 3.47-39.02; p<4.00×10-4) for each treatment, suggesting our results are robust. In contrast, we did not observe any overlap across treatments, suggesting that the treatments are associated with different alterations of the neonatal blood methylome. Gene ontology analyses of the replicating suggestively significant results indicated functions related to, for example, cell differentiation, intracellular membrane-bound organelles and calcium transport. In conclusion, for the first time, we investigated and detected effect of obstetric pain-relief on the blood methylome in the newborn child. The observed differences suggest that anesthetic treatment, such as laughing gas or pudendal block, may alter the neonatal methylome in a cell-type specific manner. Some of the observed alterations are part of gene ontology terms that previously have been suggested in relation to anesthetic treatment, supporting its potential role also in obstetric anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.