Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39298387›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Determinants of quality antenatal care use in Kenya: Insights from the 2022 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey.

John Baptist Asiimwe, Angella Namulema, Quraish Sserwanja, Joseph Kawuki, Mathius Amperiize, Earnest Amwiine, Lilian Nuwabaine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John Baptist AsiimweSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Aga Khan University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0681-9204
Angella NamulemaMbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Mbarara, Uganda.
Quraish SserwanjaPrograms Department, Relief International, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0576-4627
Joseph KawukiProgram in Public Health, Department of Family, Population, & Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Mathius AmperiizeFaculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science & Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Earnest AmwiineInfectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4104-4830
Lilian NuwabaineSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Aga Khan University, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Provision of quality antenatal care (ANC) is important to reduce maternal and newborn fatalities worldwide. However, the use of quality ANC by women of reproductive age and associated factors remain unclear in many developing countries. Therefore, this study aimed to determine factors associated with receiving quality ANC in Kenya among women of reproductive age. We analyzed secondary data from the 2022 Kenya Demographic Health Survey, which included 11,863 women. Participants were selected using two-stage stratified sampling. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the data. Of the 11,863 participating women, 61.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 59.7%-62.6%) received quality ANC. Participants aged 20-34 years had a 1.82 (95%CI: 1.15-2.87) times higher likelihood of receiving quality ANC compared with those aged 15-19 years. Those who had attended four or more ANC visits were 1.42 (95%CI: 1.14-1.79) times more likely to receive quality ANC than those who attended three or fewer visits. Participants with media access were 1.47 (95%CI: 1.06-2.03) times more likely to receive quality ANC than those without media access. Compared with participants in the "poorest" quintile, the likelihood of receiving quality ANC was 1.93 (95%CI: 1.21-3.08) and 1.44 (95%CI: 1.01-2.06) times higher for participants in the "richest" and "richer" quintiles, respectively. Furthermore, compared with participants from the Coastal region, the odds of receiving quality ANC were 0.25 (95%CI: 0.15-0.31) to 0.64 (95%CI: 0.44-0.92) times lower for those from all other Kenyan regions. Participants whose partners made their healthcare decisions were 0.74 (95%CI: 0.58-0.95) times less likely to receive quality ANC than those who made decisions independently. We found that just over 60% of participating mothers had received quality ANC. Factors associated with receiving quality ANC were: age, region, maternal education, healthcare-seeking decision-making, access to media, time to the health facility, ANC visits, and ANC provider type (doctor, nurse/midwife/clinical officer). Maternal health improvement programs should prioritize promoting access to education for girls. Furthermore, interventions should focus on promoting shared decision-making and autonomy in healthcare-seeking behaviors among pregnant women and their partners, increasing access to care provided by skilled healthcare workers, and addressing regional disparities in healthcare delivery.

Identifiers

PMID39298387
PMCPMC11412633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.